SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LORAL -- Political Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dragonfly who wrote (462)6/11/1998 2:54:00 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 880
 
Hey, fraud. Here are the facts. You claim that Lockheed and Hughes got waivers without contributions. You were challenged on that statement. Now you claim you were right because the employee PACs at these companies did not contribute to Clinton in 96. This is a non sequitor.

You are a liar and a fraud.



To: Dragonfly who wrote (462)6/11/1998 3:21:00 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 880
 
<<smoke from Dickless>>

And what is your fascination with my anatomy? Perhaps you're not actually Hillary. Perhaps you're really Monica, starved for 5 months and yearning.

If so, no thanks.



To: Dragonfly who wrote (462)6/11/1998 5:56:00 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 880
 
Did you check on the CEOs of those companies? Can you prove they did not contribute? You ARE full of it. I see you are ignoring my previous question about the great Clinton landslide and the wiretap issue. You were just as wrong there too. JLA