SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Justa Werkenstiff who wrote (20161)6/11/1998 9:05:00 PM
From: shane forbes  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 70976
 
Hey WDC going to 0 does not faze me at all - I bought it with the assumption that I will see what happens on Jan 1, 2000 and not a day sooner. I knew it was going to be a hairy ride.

FA told me that SEG had the best chance of the 3 but I wanted to gamble with the money - for fun I thought what the heck buy the one with the greatest risk - and that's what I did.

It really is only money. Something people here tend to forget too easily.

Finally in the context of portfolio returns it is the amount invested in the particular stock that is relevant - I have only a 'few' shares and thus more reason not to really care about what happens to WDC...

BTW glad you're having fun with golf - I've been likewise having a lot of fun enjoying the World Cup and riding my bike and playing soccer all day.

I don't even know or care what half the prices on my stocks are because I have half of them for a time horizon well into next year and so the day to day stuff does not bug me. Besides even with the WDC disaster I should be able to do my usual triple digit return thing by the time March 31, 1999 (my FY) rolls around and that is without any semi-equips and without getting concerned about Asia, Clinton, Maxtor, BTB and all the good stuff.

And thank you for your kind post as well.

Shane.



To: Justa Werkenstiff who wrote (20161)6/11/1998 9:27:00 PM
From: Investor2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
Any idea why AMAT is down to $27 in afterhours trading?

Best wishes,

I2



To: Justa Werkenstiff who wrote (20161)6/11/1998 9:31:00 PM
From: shane forbes  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
P.S. And here's how the 'vision of the bears' works:

GTC order for 2y $x
GTC order for 2z $x
GTC order for 1a $x
GTC order for 1b $x

You see this bear doesn't really need to keep his eyes glued to the screen - magical isn't it? - miracle of modern technology I dare say.

Shane.