Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LORAL -- Political Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dragonfly who wrote (507)	6/12/1998 6:00:00 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 880

When you don't want to answer a question, you ignore it. When jlallen proved you were wrong about Clinton's "landslide", you dismissed the topic without admitting you fabricated a tale. Same here. It doesn't matter what is said, you want to change the subject. Now we're onto 96 only. Perhaps you found the donations I told you about, and are trying to wiggle to the 96 campaign only. If you checked, you know those execs gave before 96. (And I have another another clue for you - they gave in the 96 cycle as well, it's just registered differently.) Go do your own damn research, and next time don't spread any stories until you've checked your facts. Punk.

To: Dragonfly who wrote (507)	6/12/1998 6:05:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 880

Hey DF. I don't think so. Bill asked you if you could prove that a non-donor got a waiver a la Schwarz at Loral. You made an irrelevant post about PACs. But how about the real issue? Can you prove that a non-donor (a la Schwarz @ Loral) got a waiver? I haven't seen any proof. Now if you read this post several times and use your English to Moron dictionary to translate, you will see that the ball is still in your court. Prove it. You asserted that non-donor outfits like Hughes etc. got waivers. Can you or can you not prove that the muckity mucks at those companies did NOT donate to Clinton like Schwarz @ Loral? If you can, post your proof. Otherwise, give up and go home. You have become redundant and tiresome. JLA