SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Logos who wrote (57882)6/13/1998 8:36:00 AM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
INTC: NEEDHAM & CO. made new estimate for fiscal year ending
12/98 of $2.80 on 06/12/98
INTC: NEEDHAM & CO. made new estimate for fiscal year ending
12/99 of $3.20 on 06/12/98
INTC: NEEDHAM & CO. made new estimate for quarter ending 03/99
of $0.75 on 06/12/98
INTC: NEEDHAM & CO. made new estimate for quarter ending 06/98
of $0.66 on 06/12/98
INTC: NEEDHAM & CO. made new estimate for quarter ending 06/99
of $0.78 on 06/12/98
INTC: NEEDHAM & CO. made new estimate for quarter ending 09/98
of $0.68 on 06/12/98
INTC: NEEDHAM & CO. made new estimate for quarter ending 09/99
of $0.81 on 06/12/98
INTC: NEEDHAM & CO. made new estimate for quarter ending 12/98
of $0.73 on 06/12/98
INTC: NEEDHAM & CO. made new estimate for quarter ending 12/99
of $0.89 on 06/12/98



To: Logos who wrote (57882)6/13/1998 11:09:00 AM
From: Ben Antanaitis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
All,

I have updated and posted the INTC June'98 options analysis. the Max-Pain point is $75. This either means that there is going to be some happy put owners, or there will be upside pressure from the options MMs and hedge funds this week to 'guide' the price up to the Max-Pain point. Who knows, maybe Kurlak will come out tomorrow morning and say 'the drop in INTCs price has been over done and I project a near-term price of $75...' stranger things have happened..

Ben A.
ez-pnf.com



To: Logos who wrote (57882)6/13/1998 1:24:00 PM
From: miraje  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Interesting how Intel is using a very different, low-key, strategy to defend itself, compared to the screams of bloody murder coming out of Microsoft. I think Intel's approach is much more professional, classy, and more likely to work.

I think you are 100% wrong on this. The FTC is declaring war, not only on Intel, but on intellectual property rights in general. Quiet capitulation and compromise in response to this assault on the free market will only lead to further and harsher attacks in the future. Intel should take a lesson from Redmond and fight back forcefully and publically. And on principle. When Intel (and MSFT) defend the rights to their own property, they defend my rights and those of every other citizen and business as well. This is not the Soviet Union. Yet.

JB



To: Logos who wrote (57882)6/13/1998 7:41:00 PM
From: Francis Chow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Interesting how Intel is using a very different, low-key, strategy
to defend itself, compared to the screams of bloody murder coming out of Microsoft. I think Intel's approach is much more professional, classy, and more likely to work.

Agreed. I think Intel's approach will minimize any damage from the
FTC. The last thing you want to do when a cop pulls you over for
speeding is to get mouthy . . .


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News