Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Chatting With and About God the Father -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DLL who wrote (52)	6/15/1998 4:28:00 AM
From: Roebear	Respond to of 638

Jane, Thanks DLL, Excellent, John 8! Taking No prisoners! Gotta run.....

To: DLL who wrote (52)	6/17/1998 10:13:00 PM
From: Gregory D. John	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 638

Don, Sorry I haven't been able to get to respond to your post about John 8:38-59. I'll try to get to it either next week or next weekend. I've got a pretty full plate right now. :-) I've been thinking about your questions about Jesus and the trilemma. What is your opinion of the Trinity? Greg

To: DLL who wrote (52)	6/27/1998 10:27:00 PM
From: Gregory D. John	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 638

Don, As with my apology to Jane, I would like to extend one to you for being so tardy in replying. It has been a busy couple of weeks for me. I will be reading John 8:38-59 sometime this weekend. Right off the bat, though, I suspect there is another alternative to the so-called "trilemma". It is the position that I take: that of not knowing. For you it is clear that Jesus is Lord. I asked the question about the Trinity in an attempt to show that even if you are certain that Jesus is Lord, there is still the potential for not knowing. I look at the Trinity as almost an intractable concept. But then, do you believe all things of God to be knowable by men? I still think the "trilemma" question is leading. Greg