Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (13598)	6/16/1998 10:05:00 AM
From: Larry Macklin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

no---the questions are simply not legitimate or even relevant. Thats the whole point! larry

To: jlallen who wrote (13598)	6/16/1998 10:49:00 AM
From: Jerry in Omaha	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

Mr. allen, I have been accused by Kurt, for one, of being a management cheerleader. Clearly I cheer that we are re-structuring and re-directing our objectives toward conventional proof of resources. My characterizations of the quality of debate on this thread are not meant to be indications that I wish the debate, or quibbling if I call it that, would cease. Always have I taken the size of Franklin Lake and the potential for finding extremely large quantities of precious metals in the playa very seriously. If it is true, then my preference is that we all behave as if it is; and we all strive to relay information accurately and clearly while minimizing the excesses of both praise and criticism. Kurt also talked about "thread discipline" being maintained at the expense of discussion. For me this thread should discipline itself to the highest standards of discourse because it just may turn out that we have what we all think we do and won't we look silly to historians and others who may investigate our thread if we lower our standards or prattle on about nothing in one line postings. (Citydi, of course, is our glorious exception to any one line rule as her contributions, long or short, always are welcome.) I've always had the ambition that to those inquisitive people of the future that this thread will at least make good reading. I thank any poster or contributor that furthers that objective. Jerard P