Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mama Bear who wrote (18519)	6/16/1998 5:40:00 PM
From: Ken Salaets	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

>> I have a distinct distrust of Y2K solution companuies [sic], and in particular find the "embedded chip" problem far fetched. I do believe that these are your words, and indeed, there is no reference to TAVA, Coca Cola, GM, usw.. On the other hand, I do not recall questioning your "judgement" [sic] re TAVA. Per my other inquiry, I do anxiously await your explanation for the statement above. Now granted, it may simply be a personal opinion that you have decided to embrace, and nothing more, but what if you are wrong? Also, I said nothing of the guy and his pink thing. Why did you suppose that I was referring to someone in particular? Re "Mr. sosiak," again, I do not recall making specific reference to him, but will allow that such a conclusion probably was rational. ggg. As for having it both ways, I did not accuse you of being a hypocrite, so my comments in and of themselves were not personal. Frankly, I try hard not to focus on the individual, but rather on the individual's behavior. Your comments strike me as self-indictment. I take no responsibility. I agree with your comments re portfolio diversity. I admire people who work hard to make money, whether by the sweat of their brows or by the exchange of current between brain cells. However, I despise people who endeavor to make money by doing violence to the hopes and aspirations of well-intentioned -- and often innocent -- individuals. Are there ignorant investors posting here? I think you have already answered that question. Are there lazy investors? Probably (bit of a confession there). Do they deserve to be bullied and bloodied so a few bandits can brag about the pockets they picked? Damn, woman, there are easier targets pushing shopping carts down the streets of Washington. Why not target them as well? The end justifies the means, right? Personally, I don't subscribe to such conduct. Again, I look forward to you proving that you don't either. Ken

To: Mama Bear who wrote (18519)	6/16/1998 5:46:00 PM
From: JSI	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 31646

Barb, How can you identify a company as being overvalued, and thus a candidate for short-selling, when you don't even know what it's core business is, or the magnitude and finacial breadth of the Y2K opportunity. I realize that you have stated that you haven't yet made a decision on TAVA, but what even gave you interest? I think that once you have done your DD, as most of us "zealots" have, you will see that not only is TAVA financially sound, but has the potential, with strong earnings in next two quarters, to rise substantially. IMHO JSI

To: Mama Bear who wrote (18519)	6/16/1998 10:29:00 PM
From: r. c. cummings	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

From Pink's pen on the CCSI thread: "Babs, with all due respect, CCSI is all but dead. Why waste your talent on a stock that has already been knee-capped. Mr. Pink was all over this stock in the high teens. There is new prey out there. Three shorts that could still take a fall: MRVC, SIR and TAVA. Awfully familiar (Babs for Barbara) there for two who just met last week on the CCSI thread. 'Fess up, Ms Payne, you're a Pink follower, and tainted with the loathing he generates with his lies, deceit, manipulation of facts, etc etc.