Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David B. who wrote (16208)	6/17/1998 2:38:00 AM
From: Zoltan!	Respond to of 20981

>><<Even you can't be that stupid.>> Yes, Zoltan, Lazarre can be that stupid. Stupidity is what keeps this crazy thread interesting.<< Heck, that was a rhetorical question! Starr shows Brill is a shill and nukes him so thoroughly that it is simply astonishing, a definite must-read: Full text of a 19-page letter sent by independent counsel Kenneth Starr on June 16 to Steven Brill, publisher of Brill's Content. For more information, read the recent Post stories on the topic. washingtonpost.com See National Journal (May 23, 1998, at 1162) (quoting Fox News reporter David Shuster as saying, "I made it very clear to David Kendall that it would not be in his best interest to ask Fox to reveal sources. I pointed out several examples when Kendall had leaked stuff to Fox.") It takes little imagination to divine that the strategies of gathering and leaking incriminating information could be used to maximum advantage in the context of the OIC investigation, particularly if the leaks were blamed falsely on the OIC as part of an orchestrated public attack.... [L]isten to a reporter from one of the networks who tells us he's familiar with at least a dozen of the leaks that Mr. Kendall blamed on Judge Starr. "I can tell you categorically," he says, "that they are not from Kenneth Starr's office." Brill the shill worked in tandem with Kendall!!!!: Contrary to the view you adopted (which, as you said on "Face the Nation" (June 14, 1998), is derived from your discussions with President Clinton's counsel, Mr. Kendall), Rule 6(e) does not encompass all facts that can somehow be associated with a grand jury investigation, "The disclosure of information coincidentally before the grand jury [which can] be revealed in such a manner that its revelation would not elucidate the inner workings of the grand jury is not prohibited."