Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StockMan who wrote (14641)	6/20/1998 3:16:00 PM
From: gbh	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 77400

Thus Cisco will have to try and prove they havent violated any patents in court. Tough with a judge and jury who are not that "technical" literate. Uhh, this is the US. LU will have to prove CSCO violated, not the reverse. But your second statement is true. Tough with a judge and jury who are not that "technical" literate.

To: StockMan who wrote (14641)	6/20/1998 4:39:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Respond to of 77400

Thus Cisco will have to try and prove they havent violated any patents in court. You have it 180 degrees wrong, as usual. This isn't LUnation. It's up to LU to try and prove that Cisco has violated any patents and for Cisco to defend, if necessary. The bottom line is that LU must prove something before it can win anything. >>Tough with a judge and jury who are not that "technical" literate. After reading your posts, I'm sure that Cisco would just settle for "literate".