Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : EDII -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jhild who wrote (1675)	6/20/1998 5:54:00 PM
From: ColleenB	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2849

As to ownership of the mineral rights...the press release does not mention who the owner is, so I for one have not jumped to the conclusion, nor has it been suggested on this thread that the company is in possession of such. Mineral rights in Texas are separate entities from the land. If you want to reread the thread you will find that this has been discussed in detail and no one has disputed this fact. Why do you to continue to make an issue of something that is infinitisimal in importance. The condition of the property has been provided to you in several ways...and if you prefer to see a picture of the area, look for Colin's post. The fact whether the property is swampy/marshy is of little value because the company is not bank rolling their net assets on it....simply that they now also own another chunk of land. And if from that a person wants to conclude that there might be some value in the property because of associated industries in the area then be it...you can draw your own conclusions. If after this, the light bulb still does not go off in your head, then I suggest you take another remedial class...this time in basic thinking.