Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (16352)	6/22/1998 10:05:00 AM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

Bleeding heart conservative? <g> It was painful to watch, I turned it off.

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (16352)	6/22/1998 10:17:00 AM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

Didn't Brill look like a little boy in the principal's office for the first time? I hope he didn't leave too big a mess on the floor. Brill's was just the latest reputation destroyed beyond repair by association with the Clintons. Russert really nailed him by showing Brill's manifest political bias - contributions et al - and citing Brill's own words in which Brill admitted taking direction for the story from the Clinton WH. Slick didn't help matters by hyping Brill's story at that dinner the previous week. Just served to underscore the coordination between Brill and his administration. And what was Liars-Erik Nelson there for? Everything he said was oblivious to the discussion. It didn't matter to him that virtually all the interviewees said Brill was untruthful, because Liars felt it was an important story. Seems its only importance is why a magazine devoted to "media criticism" would come up with something that was so untrue. Btw, do you get The Weekly Standard? Their cover story is an evisceration of Brill and his article.