Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Airstar Technologies, Inc. (ASTG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Auditor who wrote (3108)	6/22/1998 9:21:00 PM
From: Sam The Money	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 3967

Puffy; or whomever else; I have been reading your allegations of theft by the current management and all the proof you have. I believe you had offered that if anyone were to request them from you, you would send the documents to them. Here is my formal request. Please either e mail any information you have to sam_the_money@yahoo.com or fax them to 626-564-3376. Let me make sure you know how I intend to use them. Since you along with the Lanzas keep talking about the law suit and none has been forth coming, I am pursuing things on my own. Several people have contacted me and are interested to be part of this. I will be using any factual information you provide me in evaluating our legal law suit. Let me also be clear that I believe Lanza is the culprit of all this and he will take the prime share of the law suit. There is enough allegations and facts that has given me reason to believe that the Lanzas need to be looked into further. Joe Lanza after all was the primary person to arrange for the management team of Airstar. And it seems like he was manipulating the stock all along as is usually the case with these penny stocks. He also has the right background to be a suspect in any wrong doings that has been going on with this company. (i.e. the previous Indiana law suite and the verdict on that!) This is not to say there isn't any problem with the current management or I support any of them. That's why if you can provide any hard documentation to support your allegation that the people running the show are thieves then lets see them. Again, I will be using them to discuss things with Jim Miller, my attorney. So be clear on what the use of those documents will be. Now having said all this, I suspect you will not provide me any of the so called hard documentation of facts, because you are just another front for the Lanzas and we all know Joe and Jayne Lanza are crooks. This is just a lame way of Lanza trying to divert the attention away from his illegal manipulation of ASTG stock. It is my belief that the reason this stock is acting irrationally is because of Lanza being at work here. He or his agents are at work again and are manipulating the stock. There is no reason to see this kind of radical change based on no news form the corporation or changes in the operation of the company or for that matter any changes in the financial outlook of the corporation. Moreover, if all these allegation of theft is correct, why and who in the right mind would want to dump more money into this company. Sam. PS, Jack are you interested in pursuing things legally? what about you Wes and TJS?

To: Auditor who wrote (3108)	6/22/1998 10:32:00 PM
From: Wes	Respond to of 3967

Puffy: that is good wes--blame the lanza's. Does everyone remember when news of the case of United States of America vs. Joseph Lanza, Jayne Lanza, United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division, Filed January 12, 1996, No. 8: 96 CR-001 JM came upon us? Around that time our "buddy" Joe Lanza posted this: Message 1792049 Just some piddling tax stuff, BIG DEAL!! Well, here are quotes of the tax charges: BEGIN QUOTE: (False Tax Returns) Count 15 On or about October 15, 1989, in the Northern District of Indiana, and elsewhere, the defendant, JOSEPH LANZA did willfully make and subscribe, and cause to be made and subscribed, a United States individual income tax return (FORM 1040) for the calendar year 1988, which return was verified by a written declaration that it was made under penalty of perjury and was filed with the Internal Revenue Service, which return he did not believe to true and correct as to every material matter, in that it was stated on his 1988 Federal Income Tax Return that his taxable income was twelve thousand dollars ($12,000) whereas the defendant then and there knew and believed that his taxable income during the year1988 was substantially in excess of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). In violation of Title 26, United States Code, Section 7206(1). END OF QUOTE. Counts 16 through 18 on the tax matters are extremely interesting and I will post them as time permits. They are long, but worth reading. Wes