SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (16521)6/25/1998 12:34:00 PM
From: John Hensley  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20981
 
I'm not a lawyer but I think Starr was really stretching on this one. The only argument which could be made specifically in Foster's case (and one I thought the Supreme Court would allow) was the fact that had Foster been alive, Starr could subpoena him to testify before the Grand Jury. The notes were the next best think in this circumstance.



To: DMaA who wrote (16521)6/25/1998 9:10:00 PM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 20981
 
As much as I would like to get the notes, I think the principle is more important. Its a case of bad facts making good law. JLA


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News