Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Enamelon (ENML) - Does anyone follow this? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mel Spivak who wrote (645)	6/26/1998 1:44:00 PM
From: Mama Bear	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 863

Can you tell us why the insiders sold all their shares earlier this year if this is such a great company? Barb

To: Mel Spivak who wrote (645)	6/26/1998 2:29:00 PM
From: drakes353	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 863

Mel: Um, isn't this the 14th study showing the stuff "works"? Think the impact of such announcements has been a bit diluted, don't ya? drakes353

To: Mel Spivak who wrote (645)	6/26/1998 4:56:00 PM
From: Q.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 863

Curious report on the studies: sure the toothpaste will remineralize enamel. After all, its only listed active ingredient is fluoride. Just like Crest, Colgate, etc. And fluoride remineralizes your teeth. Somebody please correct me if I'm wrong. The news release didn't claim that the toothpaste remineralized enamel any better than a control group of regular fluoride toothpaste. And that is the only thing I would have found to be meaningful. I would assume that the dental researchers listening to the talk would have had the opportunity to ask, 'hey, where's your control group'. But readers of news releases don't have that opportunity.