Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Vinman who wrote (58870)	6/26/1998 6:47:00 PM
From: Diamond Jim	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

RE: "Their management should be questioned, they were blind sided by sub $1000 category....." ++++++++++++++++++++++++ Really, who is making $ on the <1k PC ? CPQ ?, (who started it), checked their earnings lately ? AMD & earnings - no such thing, NSM - no., who ? Only Intel is making $, profits may not be growing right now, but they still make them. You know who the Vinman is ? I do. jim

To: The Vinman who wrote (58870)	6/26/1998 9:38:00 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

Vinman - Re: " INTC was at $100 last August and with a close of $76 3/8 it has obviously been a bad investment ..." You also stated your favorite ERGO dropped from 6 1/4 to 3 5/8, a 42% drop so you jumped on it. Intel is down about 25%, but you feel a company whose stock that is down 42% is a better company. I like your thinking. It gives us all a big laugh! Paul

To: The Vinman who wrote (58870)	6/27/1998 1:48:00 AM
From: Darren	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

INTC on the other hand has been a terrible performer. INTC was at $100 last August and with a close of $76 3/8 it has obviously been a bad investment recently. Really? 10 points in 4 days not good enough for you? Oh ya, you thought you could get rich shorting INTC. Oops, those that went L just 5 bagged you...and we slept well each and every night... Their management should be questioned, they were blind sided by sub $1000 category... Blindsided? They neglected the market intentionally. No margins. Also, when you are as large as INTC, it makes no sense to be first to market. Let someone else build the market, then take it from them...That is what is going to sent INTC to $120...