SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ksuave who wrote (16552)6/27/1998 7:37:00 AM
From: Catfish  Respond to of 20981
 
Richard,

Regarding tobacco legislation: See post #16330.

Darrell



To: ksuave who wrote (16552)6/27/1998 10:15:00 AM
From: Catfish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20981
 
Richard,

You wrote "Prayer breakfast with Christian Coalition" as a part of Trent Lott's to do list.

Maybe you have forgotten that this country was founded on christian principles. Check your money and see if you can find the words "In God We Trust". Freedom of religion (as opposed to freedom from religion as you seem to advocate) was a part of these initial founding principles.

Darrell



To: ksuave who wrote (16552)6/27/1998 10:20:00 AM
From: Zoltan!  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20981
 
Why do Dems need new campaign finance laws to break? They break the old ones at will with little consequence from the most partisan Justice Dept since it was run by RFK. They subsequently passed a law against that abuse.

Now we need more laws to force the Justice Dept to act in the interests of the US rather than the Clintons and their cronies. Why did they drop the charges against Hillary's friends in organized crime?

New campaign finance laws are a simple diversion from the real issue of widespread Dem criminality.



To: ksuave who wrote (16552)6/27/1998 4:16:00 PM
From: lazarre  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20981
 
RB:

You forgot:

submit bill to now allow tobacco products to be bought with food stamps

get larger photo of Gary Bauer for my bedroom night table



To: ksuave who wrote (16552)6/28/1998 12:01:00 AM
From: Catfish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20981
 
Frightening scenarios raise new security questions

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By George Will
(Published June 23, 1998)

WASHINGTON--Former Sen. Sam Nunn, the Georgia Democrat, is among the best presidents this nation never had. As was the case with another such, Sen. Henry Jackson, the Washington Democrat, Nunn's most conspicuous service--stressing security threats that people would rather not think about--was an impediment to his presidential aspirations.

Recently Nunn, a decorous Cassandra, addressed a small meeting of military and other specialists on the subject of new security threats. He presented a quiz, in which he sketched eight frightening scenarios and asked his listeners to decide which were fact and which were fiction.

1. A region declares itself a state independent of the fragmenting Soviet Union, asserts ownership of nuclear weapons on its territory, requiring nuclear commanders to swear allegiance to the new state. Russian troops sent to retrieve thousands of tactical nuclear weapons are thwarted by the new state's militia. Only Russia has the unlock codes needed to launch strategic nuclear missiles, but the locking devices are built in the new state, which could replace the old ones.

2. A cadre of political and military figures--the defense minister, the chief of the General Staff, a senior intelligence official and some extreme nationalist politicians--topple the regime of a heavily armed nuclear state, placing the president under arrest. The plotters declare a nuclear alert for all forces. The military retains control of launch codes, but the military splinters, breaking and confusing the nuclear chain of command until the coup collapses.

3. Blips on Russian radar sites suggest one or more missiles being launched from the Norwegian Sea where U.S. and U.K. submarines operate with ballistic missiles capable of hitting Moscow in 15 minutes. In Russia's doctrine, the main option is to launch retaliatory forces no later than 10 minutes after an attack is detected. Russia's General Staff orders missile commanders to begin launch preparations. Two minutes before deadline, Russia's warning center informs the government that the flight path of whatever has been detected involves no threat. Days later, the Russians find a misplaced U.S. notification of a satellite launch.

4. A computer hacker calling himself "Phantom Dialer" gains access to various computer networks worldwide, including those of universities, corporations, banks, federal agencies and military facilities, including top secret weapons research sites. FBI agents find Phantom Dialer in Portland, Ore. He is brain-damaged by viral hepatitis, with fingers gnarled from typing on a computer 20 hours a day. He lives in a room filthy with rotting food and dog feces. The FBI flinches from prosecuting him, and instead keeps the story quiet.

5. Two hackers penetrate computer systems worldwide including systems at a U.S. Air Force laboratory and the South Korean nuclear agency.

6. After Desert Storm, Libya, convinced it cannot compete with sophisticated U.S. weaponry, cultivates 25 computer whizzes. Their mission is to be able, by 2000, to disrupt U.S. telecommunications, energy, finance, transportation and emergency services.

7. A criminal organization spirits tactical nuclear weapons out of Russia and sells them to terrorists supported by Libya and Iran. At Russia's Ministry of Atomic Energy, disgruntled personnel, having gone unpaid for months, sell weapon-grade fissile materials to a criminal organization.

8. Two nations with extreme religious and historical animosities (including three recent wars, and a simmering war over disputed territory) acquire nuclear weapons, but not enough of them to deter a disarming nuclear first strike, and neither has a sophisticated warning system. As terrorism increases, the military leader of one of the nations tells his prime minister that they must launch a pre-emptive strike or lose their weapons.

Nunn says scenarios 1 through 5 have occurred, 6 and 7 are imaginary, and 8 may be unfolding on the Indian subcontinent. "The world," he says, "has never before had an empire collapse still containing over 30,000 nuclear weapons, tons of chemical and biological weapons, thousands of missiles, and scientists who know how to make these weapons, but don't know how to feed their families."

Nunn's suggestions include: a joint U.S.-Russian missile warning system (which could lead to missile defense cooperation); joining with Russia to provide missile launch warning to both India and Pakistan; helping Russia solve any Year 2000 computer problem affecting its missiles, nuclear arsenal or nuclear power plants; joint law enforcement efforts targeted at terrorism; and working with Russia to safeguard and eliminate our weapon-grade plutonium and highly enriched uranium stockpiles.

We live, Nunn says, in an era of "big challenges and little ideas." He is too polite to say: little leadership, too. However, his insistent voice is a reproach to others who are not doing their duty to describe the world as an increasingly dangerous place.

You may write to George Will c/o Washington Post Writers Group at 1150 15th Street, N. West Washington D.C., 20071.

sacbee.com