Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : MIDL .... A Real Sleeper -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ga Bard who wrote (1740)	6/29/1998 11:51:00 AM
From: Dusty	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7039

To ALL: Let me make one thing VERY CLEAR I have not received any inside information from TMB! I was simply told by him that he did not represent McAndrews. He tells me he has told Gary this personally. Yet Gary continues to imply that just the opposite. WHY? TMB made one post to the thread. This was in my opinion a word of caution to the shareholders. This post consisted of two links to information that was to inform the shareholders, and suggesting shareholders to use caution. Nothing more and nothing less. How ANYONE could misconstrue this to mean TMB was bring any case to the threads and using SI thread as a forum is beyond me? Dusty To: Ga Bard (1388 ) From: TMB Tuesday, May 12 1998 8:13AM ET Reply # of 1756 FYI, You may wish to review the following concerning Daniel W. Fisher: (1) Pennsylvania Securities Bulletin - June 1997 located at state.pa.us (note that there is a "_" between "PA" and "Exec" that doesn't show up as part of this message when it is published); and (2) Field of Schemes - List of Defendants in FTC Cases located at ftc.gov. Please be careful and continue to question the accuracy and source of all information concerning Arcon.

To: Ga Bard who wrote (1740)	6/29/1998 12:41:00 PM
From: Dowgal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7039

Gary, Do you have any insight that you can share regarding who is preventing the transferring of the patents from Nova Gaz and what is the reason. We can all guess..... but what are your thoughts? From the June 29, 1998 Business Wire: <.... the patents which Mr. Fisher and his affiliated entities claimed that Arcon Energy owned are the property of an entity known as Nova Gaz. Midland has been informed and believes that there are outstanding court orders preventing Nova Gaz from transferring the patents at issue to either Arcon Energy or Midland.>