Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : BASHERS POST THEM HERE!!!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (49)	6/30/1998 3:23:00 AM
From: Dave Gore	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 390

JANICE...you make some innacurate points IMO To: +Dave Gore (48 ) From: +Janice Shell YOU WRITE: <Sorry, he isn't. You fail utterly to grasp market mechanics. Instead you go on and on about how, essentially, it's not "fair" that you might lose money on a risky trade. Grow up.> JANICE...you are hilarious.....I said over and over, that all we are asking for is a stock that trades in accordance with how many shares are sold and bought. A stock that is not manipulated by MM's and SI threads that are not infiltrated by professional bashers. People can certainly post anything they want. But when a basher like ANALYST10 joins SI and immediately the same day begans bashing one stock and one stock only. And then Steve Fidler does the same, it gets a little suspicious. When the Stock Detective, which is owned by AXESSS, a dubious pink sheet stock, bashes stocks that are are 10 times more credible than itself, people have a right to be angry. You know, Janice it sounds like you are the one that is angry. If you feel the SEC is giving you guys a bad rap, give 'em a call. If you feel that you are unloved and that hypesters are the bigger problem, START YOU OWN THREAD...no one is stopping you. If you feel "Business Week" magazine is going overboard when they publish an article on CHOP STOCKS and stock manipulation that is hurting the samll investor, give them a call. If you feel that the Wall Street Journal reporter that just interviewed many of us has gone overboard, you can send her and her editor your viewpoints after her story comes out. Some of you are sure fighting back hard on this thread, which is fine, but you seem to be on the warpath on the wrong issues....if you are against blatant stock manipulation.....we are on the same side..if not, I have a problem. Hyping is equally wrong, but many of us are much more concerned lately with what appears to be PROFESSIONAL bashing going on....people who all of a sudden join SI and on the same day bash a stock and bash it mercilessly. People that use innuendo and fear and doubt and who many think are paid by MM's. Publications like the "Stock Detective" that may be connected to the mob, some think. Are these allegations true? Who knows but there is a lot of investigation going on by people who know the market and are much more powerful than little ol' me. I hate seeing the little guy like me get hurt. Hypesters can do that too, but this thread is focusing on bashers. Ok? Peace or must we keep going?