Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rudy Saucillo who wrote (22864)	6/30/1998 10:10:00 PM
From: mike head	Respond to of 32384

Thanks, Rudy. Well put. But Fugazis got a point... Let's hold out for Elvis! Pax et Bonum, mch

To: Rudy Saucillo who wrote (22864)	6/30/1998 11:40:00 PM
From: Hippieslayer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 32384

Besides the fact that you may not agree with The Cato institute, what evidence did you come across that is not based on fact or hard numbers. Btw, no source is without bias as much as you'd like to think. I was asked to give examples and I did. And as I wrote above just because you don't like the messenger doesn't mean the words written/spoken are untrue. In fact, there are very few news organization that would even attempt to tackle an issue such as this. That is why think tanks exist. Since you don't like my source....and I'm working on more....why don't you do the work to counter what I posted? Or give another source that "you" like that corroborates what I posted. In fact, whom do consider an unbiased news source? And BTW, the nice thing about the Cato institute is that you know right from the start where they come from. They don't hide their political affiliation which is neither repub or demo, unlike main stream journalist whom just happen to vote a certain way about 80% of the time. Cheers, fugazi While I'm on a tirade, Go Linda. Bring down the Big Creep. :-)