Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lucky Charm who wrote (4125)	7/1/1998 10:03:00 PM
From: LegalBeast	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 43774

TO ALL, ESPECIALLY NEWBIES & POTENTIAL INVESTORS I just knew it would not take much for a real example to come along: <<<<< Any facts or figures relevant to anticipated expenses, liabilities, profits, work force, etc etc.??? >>>>> ANTICIPATED???? Nope, there is not one fact asked for here that the poster has a RIGHT to know! this is what we call negative hype and fear. This poster wants you to believe that this data should be right there at your fingertips. He wants to make you think there is something wrong because you do not already know these details. Well, folks, these details are what is commonly referred to as CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. You won't find it for Wally World, you won't find it for IBM, and you won't find it here. What you will find is the simple truth: This company is growing by leaps and bounds. Very soon now, we will have Access Wall Street operational, and very soon we will find out what other deals are in the works. BUT, what you will not find is anything that is improper by law to release like that poster wants ... Now, ask yourself, WOULD THAT PERSON BE HAPPY if he were given full access to the books of the company? AHA ... I see you have the right answer. You bet he would NOT be happy, but it really doesn't matter does it? Why? Because these minute details are not going to be made public. That would be a BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (And that poster knows it), and this company is doing things correctly and legally. Maybe a little slower than some would wish, but still the right way, complete, and with the future as their goal. Don't forget that we are talking about a company that is a mere month old. Details of how much they MADE will be forthcoming at the proper time, but ANTICIPATED DETAILS ????? You will not see that coming from ANY public company. IT JUST DOESN'T HAPPEN! And it is NOT going to happen here either.

To: Lucky Charm who wrote (4125)	7/1/1998 10:14:00 PM
From: LegalBeast	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 43774

WOW, I SURE HIT A NERVE DID I NOT? Hey all, take a look at the response ... WOW, I could not have asked for a better example of what I was talking about could I? And he even dared to say I was unprofessional when HE wants the company to breach their fiduciary duty to US, THE SHAREHOLDERS! This just in off of the Reuters News Wire: Fla. man says injured by dancers' breasts A Florida man has filed suit against a nightclub, claiming he suffered whiplash when a topless dancer knocked him out with her oversized breasts, the Tampa Tribune reported Wednesday. "Apparently she jumped up and slammed her breasts on my head and just about knocked me out," the newspaper quoted plaintiff Paul Shimkonis as saying. Shimkonis, 38, filed suit seeking more than $15,000 in damages from the Diamond Dolls club. The dancer, known as Tawny Peaks, was not named in the lawsuit. According to the lawsuit, Shimkonis and friends visited the bar on Sept. 27, 1996. Because he was the guest of honor, the dancers asked him to sit on a low chair, rest his head on the back of the chair and close his eyes. The lawsuit said Peaks danced in front of him, and without warning or consent "jumped on the plaintiff forcing her very large breasts into his face causing his head to jerk backward." (Reuters) Truth is stranger than fiction ...