SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : 3DFX -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chip Anderson who wrote (5049)7/4/1998 11:10:00 AM
From: Paul A  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 16960
 
just keep in mind that Thursday was not your typical trading day, so TA probably cant be used to form an opinion. Volume was pathetic until the last 10 minutes when shorts decided to bail.

have you folks noticed how much attention we are getting on the internet? I dont know if this is good or bad but it seems like everyone and his uncle are on the 'its dirt cheap' bandwagon.. Guess it cant hurt

happy 4th all, rest well because this coming week is going to be one helluva a bulls/bear battle.



To: Chip Anderson who wrote (5049)7/4/1998 11:34:00 PM
From: Mark Rebuck  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 16960
 
i've noticed that you've been talking about the 200dma
for a while, and it has always struck me as odd.

i don't want this to sound wrong (there is absolutely no
flame intended), but: isn't it kind of silly to pay so
much attention to the 200dma for a stock that has only
been traded for 258 days?

as i recall, the first time you posted about the 200dma,
tdfx had traded for *less than* 200 days.

food for thought.

cheers!
-Mark Rebuck, rebuck@eden.com


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News