Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hugh who wrote (7523)	7/5/1998 1:15:00 AM
From: Jim Bishop	Respond to of 34075

Good for you Hugh, you have definitely redeemed yourself with me for the DUH! Regards, Jim

To: Hugh who wrote (7523)	7/5/1998 4:21:00 AM
From: zenin	Respond to of 34075

Hugh, IYO only i am sure. It very easy to simply align this company with that B company and even easier to jump to conclusions based on little or no research at all. That's the easy way out. Now take in to considerations the other reports undertaken by independent geologists within the last few years [little lone the one written before back 20 years or more] that again support the claims being made right now by the company - i say there is something worthy of spending time researching ? I don't care right now about what USA Today, CNBC or any other newspaper or section of the media want to say because my position was taken in this company way before most of these people had heard of the company, and the impact they make upon me is nil and void, but it will bring lots of new interest from people around the world that haven't yet heard about this company. A few months ago lots of people where saying how the world already knew about this company, i laughed at those comments; i think now a much larger group of people know the name Golden Eagle International and many will tell friends who will tell friends and work associates who will tell friends and so it goes; but they only know the name but not much about the claims nor the history of the area of the site, the work undertaken at that site to date and the people who are involved behind the name. Tuesday the day, so what ever will happen - will happen, i am just one person involved in this company. Cheers Jay PostScript #1: What if you look at this way, in that considering that if they actually do have what the say they have, and all of the necessary requirements are in place and almost underway ? That's the other side of this penny IMO and well worth considering i think. PostScript #2:I really enjoyed the comments from the USA Today article where Mr Don Hausen said....<Don Hausen, who retired as chief of mineralogy for Newmont Mining in 1990 and now is one of three technical advisers paid unspecified consulting fees by Golden Eagle, visited the site last September. "It's a unique and unusual deposit," Hausen says. "An experienced company wouldn't have trouble recovering it."> Mr Hausen has been on site a number or times and undertaken his own studies and compiled reports to support his conclusions.

To: Hugh who wrote (7523)	7/5/1998 9:01:00 AM
From: Probart	Respond to of 34075

Huge Sorry Huge, I do not do my dd like that. Just because USA today ran an article to me does not mean that CNCB knows about this stock. I have put in more than a years research and dd into this one. I spent three months of research before I bought my first stock and every time I discovered something else or became more aware that this was no scam I bought more - regardless of price. Now if you all think that this hinges on one guys (Guido's - hope you do some dd on him too) report you all have it wrong, it has been mentioned in many posts by others that there are many reports out. When a third party verification takes place it will be the verification of a verification of a verification............................. Now you came in here huffing and puffing with your six-shooters blazing, with what? - one hour of dd? If you think this is a Bre-X situation (I did a study of that one too), well go ahead and think that, I have to respect your opinion. However if you would look before you leap you might just see the other side of the (gold) coin. However that all said and done it is still possible that I have been taken for a ride and this might not be true for whatever reason - but at this stage I have nothing to go by to believe otherwise. regards, Probart

To: Hugh who wrote (7523)	7/5/1998 10:11:00 AM
From: Hugh	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34075

Questions for the informed. Is either of the people traveling to Bolivia a geologist? Has anyone recently visited corporate hdq.? I will be trying to contact them by phone tomorrow as I am sure a lot of people will. A couple of observations, their web site is rather glitzy and it is interesting imo that TT's letter is white on black. Makes it somewhat hard to read and harder to print. Based on the amount of time some of you claim to have spent on dd it seems to me the same amount of time spend on the bull market would have yielded fortunes over the past ten years. Just my opinion.