Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (35554)	7/7/1998 12:48:00 AM
From: Stephen B. Temple	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 41046

Franko> The slang language of Harry Newton and his 820 page "official telecommunications dictionary" is totally responsible for my lack of basic telephony understanding. ggg Facilities Based Carrier> Long distance carriers which own call switching equipment and transmission lines. <longer definition if interested> ggg Common Carrier> A company that furnishes communications services to the general public. <longer definition if interested> Harry has a way with messing up your head with his 2nd and 3rd tier definitions. What I should have said instead of> "If you understand that using VoFR, you will have a return on your investment in less than 6 months which is commonplace, then you begin to understand "quicker profits". Is " Many applications of VoFR give compiling reasons to migrate into VoFR, giving a return on investments with the applications in 6 about months. About the 6 months, I read that some where? Yes, but I don't remember, maybe it was the night the bear almost got me in my sleep. gg I have a few questions for ya in regards to VoFR> 1. Since queuing and transmission latency in both FRADs and switches are directly dependent on frame size, how might this size difference between ATM 53-byte format and the much larger frame-size "prove" VoFR to be an advantage? 2. If most IP traffic in the world is carried over frame relay or ATM (layer 2) networks, how might you envision FNet's network in this area at todays date vs what we could expect in 5 years? No hurry Temp'