Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RocketMan who wrote (17293)	7/7/1998 2:37:00 PM
From: chip	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

I've seen this done on other sites, and the results have been to just diffuse overall interest. The casual reader just gets confused by the little information overload and moves on, IMHO.

To: RocketMan who wrote (17293)	7/7/1998 3:29:00 PM
From: elk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

RM, I thought I remeber you saying you had friends who sold because of A10's postings on this thread(but it could have been someone else)? Either way there will be a certain percentage who will use this thread as a substitute for DD, unfortunate, but that is the unfortunate reality of Cyber Investing. Of course, when r^cketeer SCREAMS IN ALL CAPS BUY BUY BUY, it does not lead to informed investors. But that is exactly my point, you do not want people to buy other than as an informed investor, otherwise, they are weak hand holding those shares. They are weak hands because they are not secure in their knowledge of their investment. That is why I am amazed that with all the Long Investors here, none bothered to speak against Byron's irresponsible post. I mean does any person here want someone to BUY NOW AND LET BYRON TELL THEM WHY AT HIS SITE, I would think that No one would want that. For any people who bought at the end of last week for the first time, in anticipation of news, when they sell it at a loss, because the news did not come or did not live up to the advance billing, they will never buy DGIV again, its just a fact of psychology. That is another opportunity lost to gain new strong hands. There is only so many investors out there, and the more that are churned through on a weekly basis, like we have seen in the last 4 trading sessions, the harder it will be to find new support. As for whether I still own shares of DGIV, the answer is no, I do not. I like DGIV far too much to have risked a trading halt and SEC investigation because Roger Templeton spoke in our Chat room. I had to be completely divested by that time. The only protection for me, was that regardless of what Roger said in there, I did not stand to profit from it. For instance, if Roger made a projection that did not come true, such as the time frame for the form 10, even if the stock rose because of what he said, I personally could not profit. Since intent is important, I would be pretty much protected from most harm, though I am sure my life would have miserable for a while.<GGGGGGG> I wonder if Byron values the well being of the stock more Than his publicity for getting Jimmy Chin into his chat room?