Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GC who wrote (8355)	7/7/1998 4:32:00 PM
From: Victor Johnson	Respond to of 34075

You beat me to it. Really, what are we talking about here, .004% error. Jeez, nail him to the cross. Seriously though what is the margin of error for these things.

To: GC who wrote (8355)	7/8/1998 12:27:00 AM
From: Jon Matz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34075

The fact that Guido misstated the reserve calculations was unfortunate, but the SEC acted due to a trigger scenario like this: Guido walked in with a bagged loaf of bread and calculations as to it's exact weight. The SEC took out the loaf, shook out all the crumbs and said to Guido, looks like you counted a couple crumbs twice. Says Guido in his defence whoops I really screwed up, but what about the fact that in my report it states that we've only brought you a small loaf, there's still plenty of bread down in Bolivia, give me a break! Actually he said in his report, The lowest of the assays obtained was always used instead of the average. -- On all ore block modeling Paravicini used between 30% and 40% of the indicated cubic meterage as indicated by topographical data to ensure conservative calculations. If MINE can get financing and soon, this whole matter will be a silly little blip. If they can't and have to sell out, well that could mean big money faster than if they did have money, certainly not hundreds of dollars per share, but still big profits. IMHO Cheers, Jon