SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: umbro who wrote (9302)7/7/1998 9:04:00 PM
From: Secret_Agent_Man  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
Market Features: Short the Internet? You Must Be Out of Your Mind
By Justin Lahart and Dan Colarusso
Senior Writers
7/7/98 6:05 PM ET

Don't fight the tape. The trend is your friend. Don't try to catch a falling knife.

There are plenty of axioms on Wall Street. With the major Internet stocks making twofold
and threefold gains since June, the one you hear the most these days is: Don't get in front of
a runaway train.

There are plenty of good, fundamental reasons for people to go short Internet stocks.
Amazon.com's (AMZN:Nasdaq) market cap, for example, is twice Barnes & Noble's
(BKS:NYSE), after all -- and Barnes & Noble, with a price-to-earnings ratio of 57, is
hardly undervalued. Amazon doesn't have the E necessary for a P/E, and indeed, of the
major pure Internet plays, only Yahoo! (YHOO:Nasdaq), has actually shown earnings over
the past year. If charges aren't taken out, even that isn't true.

Investors took some profits in the group today, sending Amazon down 17 1/2, or 12.5%, to
122 1/8; Excite (XCIT:Nasdaq) down 10 3/4, or 10%, to 96 1/4; and Yahoo! down 8, or
4%, to 191. Still, nobody's calling a top. "Normally when a stock's down 8 bucks it's a big
move, but in the Internet that's like half a point," said Dan Mathisson, head stock trader at
D.E. Shaw.

Those who have gone short these stocks -- and short interest was high when it was last
tallied on June 24 -- have felt intense pain. Hedge funds that stepped in front of the Internet
stocks are rumored to be on the verge of going under. Even though most on the Street think
that these stocks will fall to earth someday, they would rather play Russian roulette with five
bullets in the chambers than go short now.

"If you're buying this thing on fundamentals, or shorting it on fundamentals, then you're
gonna miss it because they're not trading on fundamentals," said one tech trader. "There are
takeover hopes in them. There are split hopes -- Yahoo reports tomorrow and they have to
say something. There's a big short squeeze. I think maybe they can come back in once those
things are out of the way. Maybe the fundamentals will be the key then."

Or maybe not. Scott Tashman, managing partner of the hedge fund Tashman Equity
Partners, thinks that there's so little Internet stock to go around, it's become a seller's
market. "My feeling is you have a very unusual commodity in that you only have a handful
of companies that you can truly participate in," he said. "You think about the people that
want to own this stuff, the bottom line is there are not enough shares to satisfy the demand."
The float on five major pure Internet plays -- Yahoo, Amazon, Excite, Lycos
(LCOS:Nasdaq) and Infoseek (SEEK:Nasdaq) -- totals 34.1 million shares. By contrast, the
float on chewing gum purveyor Wrigley (WWY:NYSE) is 65.9 million shares.

Tashman contests the notion going around that the move in Internet stocks has been all about
individual-investor buying, known as retail. One reason that idea has taken hold is that there
are very few big blocks of these companies going by on the tape. Normally that points to
retail, but because these stocks trade so thinly, and because it's so dangerous to go short even
a little bit, market makers are willing to take on only smaller blocks. And institutions
building positions, trying not to move the stocks too much, disguise their orders by buying
only in dribs and drabs.

"These stocks wouldn't be moving if there weren't institutional buying," said one stock
salesman. "I don't believe that it's only dentists. There's got to be all kinds of buying for
stocks to go up this much."

"This is the whole point," said Tashman. "Everybody wants to own these things and there
aren't enough shares to go around. I've never seen anything so demand-oriented in my life."

That's created a situation where there aren't many governors on how quickly the stocks can
climb. "This is the kind of thing that can feed on itself," explained Mathisson. "One of the
problems is that they're really hard to borrow. Even market makers have been getting
called that they need to watch their short allocations."

Stocks are terrifically hard to short as a result, and the alternative, buying puts, is getting
more expensive.

"The put prices are going up," said one Lycos trader on the Pacific Exchange after the
sector had gotten knocked around in the afternoon. "Maybe they're reflecting the fact that
the stock is becoming hard to borrow."

Options traders often will watch the implied volatilities of at-the-money calls and puts to
determine whether the shares are getting difficult to short. The closer the premium levels,
the easier the shares are to borrow, according to Dan Haugh, the president of PTI
Securities, a Chicago brokerage firm that specializes in options. "If the exchange floors are
having trouble shorting the stock, it will be reflected in the put prices," he said. "They'd be
taking on more risk and need to be compensated for it." Haugh said retail investors might
feel the shortage of shares early but floor brokers make a better indicator because their
ability to short is generally better.

Near today's close, the implied volatility on Yahoo! at-the-money options was 96 for the call
and the put; in Excite the call volatilities were at 97 while the puts were at 112; Lycos call
volatilities were at the 119 level while the puts were at 126; and Amazon's puts were trading
at a 125 volatility while the calls were around 115.

"The only way to play it is to write deep-in-the-money calls," said Mathisson. Using this
strategy, which is safer at this point with August calls than with soon-to-expire Julys, the
writer sells calls with a strike price well below the stock's current level. This avoids a high
premium on the puts. "But there are risks in that as well," Mathisson added.

Indeed there are. Of the strategy, one Chicago wag cracked: "There are some nice
premiums, but that trade looked good last week, too. And the week before, and the week
before, and the week before, and the week before."

It isn't any wonder that people on the Street want to wait this one out.

"It's a sign of an unhealthy market that people are just chasing these stocks," said the
salesman. "You just hope you're on board. If you're not, you hope you can buy them
cheaper. I'm scared s***less of shorting them."

See Also
TOP STORIES
Just When You Thought It Couldn't Get Any Hotter
7/7/98 3 PM

OPTIONS BUZZ
Internet Interest Wanes in Options, but Egghead.com Remains Strong
7/7/98 2 PM

MARKET ROUNDUP
Yahoo! and Amazon.com Roar to All-Time Highs
7/6/98 6 PM

MARKET FEATURES ARCHIVE

c 1998 TheStreet.com, All Rights Reserved.