Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Altaba Inc. (formerly Yahoo) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas C (Hijacked) who wrote (11977)	7/8/1998 12:31:00 PM
From: MR. PANAMA (I am a PLAYER)	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 27307

YHOO SPLIT ??? Only a fool would say that would not be addressed SOON...LYCOS XCIT and Others have done so at much lower prices. If I were short these stocks with a profit I would be thankful for this pullback and bank profits.

To: Thomas C (Hijacked) who wrote (11977)	7/8/1998 12:43:00 PM
From: Sonny	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 27307

possible scenario tomorrow morning: In all likelihood, say, yhoo beats the most optimistic of the current whisper number, which is 13 cents, and, say, come out at 15-17 cents. Then, with yesterday's and today's beating, MMs will entice the small suckers tomorrow morning, saying ..."come on, come on you buddy .. see its all time high was 207 and now its doing only 175 (assuming it closes at that today) ... so you see, you can make a nice 12-15%" and the herd will pour-in, once again completely taken in by their tactics. But then, just below that all time high of 207, savvy players would have placed their sell-at $204.75 ... and it may never see that high again for another year! The small-guy would be, once again, left looking at the bag he is holding! But again, all this could be easily defeated depending on how far this message goes (how many folks-in-power read and act on it pre-emptively :-) ), as that will nullify this prediction. Market has a wonderful way of discounting the "known", no matter how dynamically it transitions its states! But, just in case it plays out like this, remember you heard it here first! :-) cheers, -/Sonny.