Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TPII - Year 2000 (Y2K); Groupware; Client Server Migration -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alan Coccio who wrote (7996)	7/8/1998 6:06:00 PM
From: Robert Gomez	Respond to of 10903

Alan, he said the revenue was 70% of the expected 1.8 million for the 4th Q, giving about 1.25 million, when I asked he agreed with. Giving them about 1.625 million for the year. They had 415,000 for the first 9 months in revenue, and he agreed with my 1.25 million in rev for the 4th Q, a 500% increse over the 250,000 rev in the 3rd Q. Not bad. 2.2 minus 415,000 = 1.8 was what was expected for the 4th Q. 70% of 1.8 million is the new number, for 4th Q revenue. 1.625 million for the year. . .

To: Alan Coccio who wrote (7996)	7/8/1998 6:07:00 PM
From: TEDennis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10903

Triple zero post just sitting here for the taking. OK. I'll take it. TED

To: Alan Coccio who wrote (7996)	7/8/1998 6:10:00 PM
From: JOHN IACOVACCI	Respond to of 10903

Not correct about 760K figure. He would not be specific but he did say 70% of yearly revenue would occur in final quarter so should be at least 1.2 mil quarter.

To: Alan Coccio who wrote (7996)	7/8/1998 7:27:00 PM
From: Dave Gore	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10903

Thanks Alan, but I actually never heard the promised 2.2 mil figure. I don't care about that anyway. If they did say it and PROMISED it, rather than just said it was possible, then they have probably learned a lesson. I am very Gestaltian...the past is the past. That is why I was not concerned about the old 10SB numbers...they are old numbers from as long as 5-6 months ago, when the company essentially had no contracts. I look for steady improvement from quarter to quarter, not week to week like some people here seemed to do. Whether we have a 300% or a 500% revenue gain this quarter is immaterial...both are excellent gains. Having their first profitable quarter is the next goal and that won't happen probably until the AUG-OCT quarter, but it should be pretty good, and the quarter after that will be far better yet if they indeed get 10 or so more contracts minimum before the Fall is over. Remember the past is the past...let's not harp on it, eh?