To: Rommy B. who wrote (1167 ) 7/9/1998 4:29:00 PM From: DrMedina1 Respond to of 2534
Re: World Vision -- Rommy, this question was extensively discussed here about a month ago. Perhaps this post will be useful to youexchange2000.com World Vision represents DFNL, which was involved in a dispute with MDCE over rights to a library of movies (the library itself, which was never in the physical custody of DFNL, has since disappeared). MDCE sued DFNL, and named World Vision as a defendant in the lawsuit, even though by no stretch of the imagination was the IR firm involved in the actual controversy. That lawsuit is now moot, since it turned out that MDCE is not incorporated to do business in any state and therefore cannot prosecute. For all that, MDCE stock still trades every day. Welcome to the OTC:BB. What is real is that World Vision has brought in hundreds of thousands of shares of buying since being retained to do IR for ALYA. With the shorts who are active against this stock and their repeated attempts to discredit this excellent startup company, things would have been a lot worse without World Vision. And on another topic, insider selling by management, what is real is that it hasn't happened. I appreciate your tolerance on this subject, Claude (which I might be inclined to share) but not everybody feels the same way. Irrespective of anyone's opinion on this subject, since it hasn't occurred, it doesn't make much sense to discuss it in the context of ALYA. What will be most helpful will be if we focus on the continuing stream of positive developments out of ALYA, and insofar as possible, ignore the various red herring issues which are being raised by people with an incentive to do so. Not everyone who wonders about the charges is necessarily part of the shorters' campaign (Rommy, you're a trial member, and can't be expected to be up on all of the history) -- but rehearsing this stuff over and over on the thread when it's been dealt with many times only plays into their hands.