SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Larry Loeb who wrote (59605)7/9/1998 12:37:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Larry - Re: " I don't believe that someone purchasing a $1000 system will be happy with it for more than 2 years. We'll see."

That is why Compaq hasn't sold 120 Mhz MediaGX machines in over a year.

Everybody - Cyrix, AMD, Intel - keeps raising CPU speeds. The KEY POINT is that if it is done properly, it costs (Intel) very little to INCREASE all CPU speeds - since their cost reductions via new process introductions and shrinking geometries - is a BONUS of the advanced technology.

And Intel's process capability - and rate of change - exceeds it's competition.

When the smoke clears, the good companies will be left standing and the not so good ones will be....

Paul



To: Larry Loeb who wrote (59605)7/9/1998 3:13:00 PM
From: Mark Brophy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
I think you're in the minority.

Personally, I like to get 5 years out of a PC for home use. I purchased a Pentium 60 in February 1994 and I don't expect to need a new PC until next year or, perhaps, 2000.

I don't believe that someone purchasing a $1000 system will be happy with it for more than 2 years. We'll see.


I've never owned a PC for more than 2 years. Typically, I use it for 18-24 months. If I was sure it would last that long, I'd buy a $1000 PC.

Have you seen any surveys that show how long the average business and home user uses his computer?