Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: EtTuBrute who wrote (4073)	7/10/1998 5:59:00 PM
From: LumpofCoal	Respond to of 25548

Yes, you're right, I'm sure. It would only add to this carnival I like to call npec/mdin/whatever. (oops, better be careful, might get sued. Is carnival a bad word?). :-)

To: EtTuBrute who wrote (4073)	7/10/1998 6:05:00 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25548

YES, I agree. Be careful what you wish for... I think the point of the FP article was simply that, where and when criminal behaviour exists, (for instance, Libel)...the courts are not too keen about sanctioning a hiding place for it. Criminal behaviour, however, is a different category than informed or uninformed opinion. Needless to say, my remarks above are generalities that have nothing to do with the specifics referred to in the article. I think all of us would like to think that we have protection against criminal attacks...no matter where they occur! SOLON