Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Al C who wrote (14183)	7/10/1998 7:46:00 PM
From: GlobalMarine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

To all: Could someone please summarize for me the current controversy , as it appears there may be some sort of confrontation at the AGM, and I want to ensure I have all the facts to make an informed voting decision. Correct me if I'm wrong here, but it rather sounds like one camp - led by Sidney Kemp, the Prez - wants more or less nothing to do with Johnson\Lett and will pursue conventional technology only. Another camp seems to want to explore Johnson/Lett to determine the merits of the process. As a shareholder, I would want all avenues explored, for all conventional technologies started out as new technologies (e.g. heap leaching in the 1980s) anyway. But I wouldn't support the notion of paying J/L a lot of $ or shares until their technology could be tested and proven to the satisfaction of a top-drawer independent mining engineering firm. Of course, there's the issue of whether the process can be patented and if so, whether it can be worked around. Any responses appreciated. Cheers!