SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : A.I.M Users Group Bulletin Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JZGalt who wrote (5020)7/12/1998 8:15:00 AM
From: Jim Battaglia  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18928
 
It means that you will have more tolerance on the sell side. Here is an example: Let's say you own GM presently at 73.87. If you have a O BUY your next sell would be at 76.95.But if you change your buy to a -9 then your sell has been delayed to 93.26. In other words you are taking more risk keeping your money invested but you have greater reward. You need to experiment with the safe numbers in Newport to meet your risk tolerance. I hope I answered your question.

Jim



To: JZGalt who wrote (5020)7/12/1998 9:36:00 PM
From: Bruce A. Bowman  Respond to of 18928
 
Hi Dave-

SAFE (Resistance) levels set the trading range. Minimum trade values
lie outside the range. For plain vanilla AIM, i.e. Mr. L's
by-the-book values (and excusing the crude graphics):

|------ Buy SAFE = 10%: .1 * 6,667 = -667
|<---------|
+----------+----------+-------------------
-------------- PC = 6,667 --->|--------->|
Sell SAFE = 10%: .1 * 6,667 = 667 --|

Now assume buy SAFE = -9% and sell SAFE = 10%:

Buy SAFE = -.09*6,667 = 600 ----------|
|-- -9% ->|
------- PC = 6,667--------->+---------++-------------------
|-- 10% -->|
Sell SAFE = 10%: .1 * 6,667 = 667 ----|

For the sake of those not familiar with the AIM algorithm I'll put
some numbers with this. Assume 1,667 sh @ 4.000/sh for the initial
buy (1,667 * 4 ~= 6,667). The orders would be:

Current number of share = 1,667 (CurShares)
Minimum trade value = 500 (MinTradeVal)
Buy SAFE value = -9% (BuySAFEPct)
Sell SAFE value = 10% (SellSAFEPct)
Portfolio control = 6,667 (PC)
BuySAFE = PC * BuySAFEPct = 6667*(-.09) = -600 (BuySAFE)
SellSAFE = PC * SellSAFEPct = 6667*(.10) = 667 (SellSAFE)
Account value at the buy = PC - BuySAFE
= 6667 - (-600)
= 6667 + 600
= 7267 (AcctValAtBuy)
Price = AcctValAtBuy/CurShares = 7267/1667
= 4.359 (BuyPrice)
Shares: MinTradeVal/BuyPrice = 500/4.359
= 114.697 (Shares)
Account value at the sell = PC - SellSAFE
= 6667 + 667
= 7334 (AcctValAtSell)
Price = AcctValAtSell/CurShares = 7334/1667
= 4.399 (SellPrice)
Shares: MinTradeVal/BuyPrice = 500/4.399
= 113.662 (Shares)

So the orders would read: buy 114.697 XYZ at 4.359 limit
sell 113.662 XYZ at 4.399 limit

These are nonsense orders if we're dealing with stocks and would have
to be adjusted to even 32nds and even shares. The thing of interest,
though, is the trading range: 0.040 from a buy to a sell. This is an
incredibly narrow range, and you'd never encounter it in a stock, but
it may not be that far fetched for a MF like a bond fund if you're
looking for a lot of trades.

Bruce



To: JZGalt who wrote (5020)7/14/1998 9:36:00 AM
From: OldAIMGuy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18928
 
Hi Dave, I've fiddled off and on with negative Buy SAFE for very small AIM accounts and for very conservative investments to get AIM to activate some buys.

The biggest problem with the negative SAFE is that it forms a mathematical "feedback loop" much like a squealing microphone! After the first buy, it tends to accelerate the buying. This can exhaust the cash reserve way more quickly than we may want.

Please, "USE WITH CAUTION"!!!

Best regards, Tom