Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MGV who wrote (3327)	7/12/1998 2:05:00 PM
From: John Curtis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

Mark: Hmmmm....."There are three or four people(certainly not everyone or even the majority) who post a blind, unthinking allegiance to VLNC" Well, sweeping generalist that I am enables me to recognize the same when expressed by others. After all, "blind," "unthinking?" How can you possible know? Once again, physician heal thyself. HEH! But seriously though, as I've already stated on Yahoo, for a VLNC thread newbie you seem to take as a personal affront any long(otherwise stated by me in my generalist's manner as the positivists camp) comments. And I'm sure, since I see you're a positivist on other threads, you can understand unbridled enthusiasm, as expressed, here. This thus beg's the question. Why, Marcus, do you expend such energy, particularly after having made your initial point? Is there a grudge going on here that somehow other threadsters have gotten caught in the crossfire on? Please, explain. Bottom Line? We'll know soon enough who's right, since it IS clear VLNC needs to be moving, and soon, on such things as financing, etc.. Time, as they say, is short(once again, no pun intended!) John~

To: MGV who wrote (3327)	7/13/1998 1:07:00 AM
From: Gordon Quickstad	Respond to of 27311

You're working a little too hard on this, Mark. Are you a Provocateur trying to ferret out a little insider leakage information to apply the skills of your trade to? I know it's tough to try and keep the DayTimer filled with productive $200/hr activity. It sure would sound good in the hometown newspaper, too: "Local Man Pursues Rampant Stock Fraud on the World Wide Web." Subtitle: "Unsuspecting Pensioners Lose Millions". Lead off sentences: "With even the Vice President, Al Gore, proving to be a powerful proponent of the Information Super-Highway, we don't always stop to ask ourselves, is there any danger in merging onto this high-tech speedway? Should there be a minimum level of safety for those who might venture out into the path of unlicensed speedsters? This is just the concern our own Mark Visnic felt several years ago as he was reading a Barron's article...