SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Trimble Navigation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hockeyfan who wrote (2591)7/13/1998 3:59:00 PM
From: SKIP PAUL  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3506
 
Patents obtained by Trimble within the last 30 days:

1.5,777,580 Vehicle location system
2.5,774,826 Optimization of survey
coordinate transformations
3.5,774,825 System for automatic vehicle
location via cable TV
4.5,771,456 Enhanced suppression of multipath
interference
5.5,767,804 Integrated radio direction finding and GPS
receiver tracking system
6.5,764,770 Image authentication patterning
7.5,764,172 Hybrid DAC suitable for use in a GPS receiver
8.5,761,456
Processor device having automatic bus sizing
9.5,760,909 Integrated
apparatus and method for EDM and GPS surveying
10.5,760,748 Pivoting
support bracket to mount a GPS antenna above a theodolite or a total
station mounted on a tripod.



To: Hockeyfan who wrote (2591)7/14/1998 3:07:00 PM
From: Yin Shih  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3506
 
Thanks for correcting my misunderstanding. With revenue/expense period matching, then what I described would not be correct unless the indirect expense (which would be charged to a current period) to direct expense (which would be matched with revenues) costs for a product had a much higher than usual ratio, i.e. very high leverage. For hardware products, my personal experience is that the best direct costs to revenue margin I've ever seen was something like 10%. This would result in something like 12-13 cents impact on earnings. On the other hand for higher priced software, direct costs to revenue are often well under 5%, which could still result in 14-15 cents impact on earnings.

I'm trying to construct a scenario that might explain what I consider to be the conflicting comments by the CFO of a "satisfactory" quarter a few weeks before this earnings revision was attributed to a $5M order delay. Otherwise, I would have to conclude that management made a deliberately false statement which would be a rotten kettle of fish.