Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Warp 10 Tech. (WARP) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ted M who wrote (1032)	7/13/1998 9:54:00 PM
From: IN_GOD_I_TRUST	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1164

I agree it also looks suspicious. But let's be logical about this. Firstly, he is under a microscope right now personally. If he did do anything illegal with WARPF in his selling or potential buying, he probably would be picked up immediately. Unless he has disguised it real well, which is possible! But it was very high risk and might not be worth the chances he would be taking! He would have got a some type of a rise from WARPF just on the recent news. Secondly, maybe the company, in a great PR move and by some luck, coincidentally timed the good news soon after the Banks departure on purpose, to get is much bang for their buck as possible. They have made so many bad PR moves, especially dealing with Banks involvement, that finally they turned the corner and piggy backed great news stories, one after the other as a way to get a huge lift. Either way evaluate WARPF on the numbers, when they are all published. And forget about that jerk! The sooner we distance Banks from WARPF the better! Let WARPF be profitable to us all, now and in the future! From a very burned past investor in WARP 10, Steve