Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FMK who wrote (3356)	7/14/1998 12:17:00 AM
From: MGV	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

With all due respect, the suppositions expressed in your last post are utterly ridiculous. Your principal point, which is that the posts that held up for scrutiny those issues that were raised in a 10K report were the cause for a sell off in VLNC stock, is inane. I really can't believe that you believe that. The 10K raised issues that many investors were surprised to see had not been resolved. By the time the CC ended, sound questions to some fundamental issues remained unanswered. To attribute the heavy selling on the day of the CC to my posts suggests that the sellers didn't make independent but similar judgements based on the 10K and the CC, after it failed to allay concerns. The stock began to sell off immediately after the 10K was issued. It was at 6 1/4. By the time I saw the 10K, the price already was at least 5 3/4. It is a given that as more people read the 10K on that Monday afternoon and evening, selling pressure built for the open the next day. The highest the stock has been since that day has been 5 7/16. It traded as low as 4 31/32 today. If my posts were as persuasive in holding the price down for 2 weeks, why haven't yours succeeded in raising the price back up Fred? The question is rhetorical. The answer of course is the overall market isn't being influenced by me and apparently, now, certainly not by you. Your downplay of the 10K is negligent in the best light. Your scheming is offensive. The upshot is that readers are seeing a side of FMK that may have surprised them.

To: FMK who wrote (3356)	7/14/1998 12:30:00 AM
From: Emmo	Respond to of 27311

Indeed, investors not only have to worry about management giving bad information, there a stockbrokers offering bad advise and of course the hot tip from your brother-in-law. Now we have the internet to worry about. Mark V. has appeared and offers investors "new" information about the company "discovered" in their 10K. He can be trusted because he offers to "save" the unwary investor from the certain failure of the company. Others who suggest success can not be trusted because they are strangers and offer false information. Did Mr. Mark offer the same warning to the investors of Yahoo when it IPO'd?? After all, the same negative information regarding the success of the company could be found in their 10K. I think not. So why are you here? So many others are in need of the information you find in the 10K of start-up ventures looking for investors. Why not help them as well? Or is the real reason more to do with whose shares you need to buy and at what price? Mark V.,,try coming up with something fresh.