Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ASHTON MINING OF CANADA (ACA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DIAMOND JIM who wrote (5630)	7/14/1998 6:21:00 PM
From: philip trigiani	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7966

Frank, Whats your opinion on the MMU NR?

To: DIAMOND JIM who wrote (5630)	7/14/1998 7:27:00 PM
From: Ned Land	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 7966

"Marum has missed" Jim, I think you're wrong. Today was a "good news" day for the ADP. The company explained in April: The intent of the drilling was to test overburden thickness and to obtain samples from basal till and bedrock in the vicinity of magnetic and/or physiographic anomalies defined by airborne and ground magnetic surveys. The airmag data they had was not suitable to do much else (than give a proximal drilling site) and, what is more, the company's coffers aren't overflowing with cash, so they had to have a reasonable basis for believing they were on the trail of kimberlite -- hence the till samples. This is also why they elected to use and RC drill which is seldom capable of penetrating kimberlite. The alternative approach -- the one I call the "Montello splash" -- is where you use a diamond drill to validate the existence of magnetic sands. I think that the company now knows they have kimberlite nearby; With new, high resolution airmag data, they just have to drill a few targets. Alas, a real drill program! Money remains a problem, though. I know everyone's getting a bit cynical -- especially since ACA's in the doldrums and some juniors are spending money like sailors without consequence -- but, unless we're prepared to acknowledge progress short of a 29.2 carat diamond, we're bound to fulfill the prophecies of our many naysayers. After this next NR it could be a long time till the next one - without impressive results or stones (eg 5-10 ct) we may fall below $2. I think everyone realizes this Sometimes progress is measured in inches not feet. This notwithstanding, it remains "progress." Again, today was a good day for the ADP.