Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : GLOW - Global Games, Inc. - Great Profit Potential ! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BigRedMan who wrote (4688)	7/15/1998 2:04:00 AM
From: Greg Hodges	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8879

Back at post #4590 I asked this question to TGW. After becoming a fully reporting company is GLOW going to be OTC:BB or NASDQ listing? Unfortunately we never received a reply on this thread. Greg

To: BigRedMan who wrote (4688)	7/15/1998 9:49:00 AM
From: Thomas George Warner	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8879

come on lets not throw up the smoke and mirrors. you know very well how to get the information, and why would you add "and legally act on that information" as thought it was illegal to ask any company for financial information. This is a publically traded company, owned by the stockholders. Have you a seen the stockholders bill of rights? What are your rights as a GLOW stockholder and why do you think they are any different than those for coca cola or any other publically traded company? I do indeed have more than a minimal grasp of the stock market. One never beats a horse whether alive or dead. In this case GLOW cannot seem to stand up to even the most elementary analysis. If it could you would not be bringing up the smoke and mirrors! Right? I don't understand your question relative to "an incredibly simple concept". However if by incredibly simple concept you mean the following, I understand completely. I have noticed that several posters seem to post on the same stocks and ask and receive questions from one another. They seem to act under the team approach. Lurkers to this thread should click on the posters name and see for themselves. Isn't that strange that all of the insulting, rah rah posts are coming from these very people. Maybe the SEC should indeed look into this! On second thought maybe I will dig deeper. What will I find? Any wagers? 1. Brad 2. Cheryl 3. Brian 4. Peppaman(a trial member) 5. Big Red Man(A trial member) 6. Endwrench (a trial member) 7. Orac 8. Crimson 9. Trumpcards