Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : James Cramer Skeptic Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: James J. Cramer who wrote (476)	7/15/1998 11:38:00 AM
From: joe	Respond to of 1254

>>Could we get the webmistress to close this thread? I think we should close it.<< I don't know the rules, but I will ask.

To: James J. Cramer who wrote (476)	7/15/1998 11:39:00 AM
From: HairBall	Respond to of 1254

James, I think you are right. I will request it! And, I don't use your service or follow you at all. But, enuff is enuff. Regards, LG

To: James J. Cramer who wrote (476)	7/15/1998 12:01:00 PM
From: Peter Speyer	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1254

I wrote webmistress Jill a few weeks ago asking her to change the name of the thread. She said she would ask Brad and Jeff, and after that, I never heard back, so I assume they were unwilling to do so, or forgot to attend to it. I doubt SI will close the thread, but the quickest way to make it die, Jim, is not to post here anymore. This thread was dying, with 11 posts in ten days, mostly supportive of you, until you posted here. Once you posted here, it was a magnet for mudslinging at you. In January, when I was defending your honor on the OZON thread, you wrote me you would not go on SI to defend yourself against bogus charges, as it leads to more bogus charges. You were right, and the proof is here. Your presence draws those jealous of your success, I do hope you will post on SI at times on other threads, but I would leave this one alone. It will die on its own without you. Remember, critics are always the loudest voices. Your writing on TSC and the integrity within every line speak volumes.

To: James J. Cramer who wrote (476)	7/15/1998 3:12:00 PM
From: SliderOnTheBlack	Respond to of 1254

I'll 2nd that motion.........one word; Jealously. ----- make that 2 words; petty jealously. JJC; Do NOT ever let them drag you down; hell you call all ways do what Roger Maris did to the ''loonies'' in the bleacher seats in the summer of '61 -- hit them with your wallet; but I know you have too much class for that... A ''hate'' thread; think about it... this guy is someone's father, someone's son; I don't think anyone here should be able to look themselves in the mirror and sleep well at night; pathetic & sad. This guy is a ''gamer'' I'd take Cramer at my back anyday; he's done more for adding a liitle excitement to the investing world than anyone ! Get a life guys...

To: James J. Cramer who wrote (476)	7/15/1998 5:02:00 PM
From: Snowshoe	Respond to of 1254

>>Could we get the webmistress to close this thread?<< This discussion is still active? Jeez, I thought by now everyone had agreed that the spun polyester hat thread is superior to the cotton mercerized hat thread...