SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (51526)7/15/1998 5:47:00 PM
From: jimleon  Respond to of 176387
 
Hey Chuzz. Yes still own DCLK. I know barriers to entry
are easy, but i still feel one needs to take a shot
at some type of internet stock, just in case the earnings
come say 2000 do meet the hype of 1998. I own 10 times
more dell than dclk. : )

I agree with your calculation of dividing peg by peg of the
S/P. But I suggest you do the division based on the type
of stock you are analyzing. Like dell would be divided
by nasdaq, dupont by the dow, etc... Dont mix apple and
oranges across sectors. Keep it sector specific. Go Dell. So looking back, DELL was OVERSOLD at 86! lol



To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (51526)7/15/1998 6:08:00 PM
From: Dell-icious  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
From The Motley Fool: must read for DELL and CPQ investors.
Compaq Bear's Den
by Louis Corrigan (tmfseymor@aol.com)

Investors need to know what they're buying. However,
Compaq is no longer a known quantity.

Looking at FY97 results, I see a computer giant that
delivered $24.6 billion in sales (up 23%) and $1.35 in
earnings per share (up 52%), excluding non-recurring
charges. Its PC sales grew at around 63%, or four times
faster than the industry overall. Meanwhile, gross
margins rose from 25.8% to 27.5%. Operating margins
before taxes and charges jumped to 12.3% from 9.7%.
Meanwhile, its acquisition of Tandem boosted the
enterprise business to 37% of sales in the fourth
quarter, helping to counteract margin pressure in the
desktop business.

Such terrific numbers sent Compaq shares soaring from
under $15 at the end of `96 to nearly $40 by September.
But since then, the stock has been crushed due to
dismal results in the increasingly competitive PC market
and a whole lot of uncertainty about what the purchase
of Digital Equipment Corp. (DEC) will mean for Compaq.

First quarter revenues increased just 8% as the
company finally had to admit that much of the inventory
it had pushed into the reseller channel in the latter half of `97 was still there. The
result was some very bad news: EPS fell to $0.01 versus $0.28 in the year-ago period,
as gross margins fell to 18% from 26.9%. Second quarter results are expected to be
merely break-even because the company has been forced to slash prices and even
halt some production. While inventory held by resellers at the end of the second
quarter should be around 4 weeks versus 10 weeks earlier in the year, that's still a lot
in a marketplace that is keying off of Dell's build-to-order model.

Compaq had promised a rapid implementation of its own build-to-order
manufacturing last summer, but it so botched that initiative that its inventories
actually soared. Yet, while Compaq is fighting Dell, it's also using the DEC deal to
refocus its business around services, system integration, and all the other stuff that
transforms hardware into "enterprise computing" and "information technology."
That sounds fine, but let's check out the pro forma combined financial statement for
FY97. DEC would have pumped up Compaq's revenues to $37.6 billion, but EPS of
the combined firms would have actually dropped to $1.10.

That doesn't take into account the pending $5.4 billion restructuring that will claim
17,000 jobs and no doubt enhance future results. Still, Compaq's core business has
suffered from slowing sales, shrinking margins, and rotten execution. The company
is now looking to refocus its operations by acquiring a business that won't add to
profits unless Compaq executes like crazy.

Investors should all but ignore current analyst estimates; they're little more than
guesses. Compaq may have found the future of computing, but until it shows it can
deliver, why rush in? Here are the main reasons this one-time star has dropped from
the A list to the D list.

Disclosure: On January 21, CEO Eckhard Pfeiffer said he expected a "strong 1998"
with "improve[d] profitability." Right! Everybody and his brother was already
worried about Compaq's excess inventories, and the firm was six weeks away from
pre-announcing the first quarter disaster. Management refused to be straight with
investors. On other occasions, Compaq has told money managers material
information without bothering to tell the public. Companies with poor execution and
poor disclosure are the kind you want to avoid.

Demand: Worldwide growth in PC sales has slowed from 15% last year to just over
10% in the first quarter to maybe 9% in the second quarter. With everyone looking
to capture market share, price competition is intense, underscoring the necessity of
low-cost manufacturing.

Dell: Given the above, build-to-order rules because the value of inventory drops 1%
per week. Dell has about a week's inventory while Compaq has four weeks of
channel inventory plus several weeks of in-house inventory. So, until Compaq
executes to precision, Dell has a significant price/profit advantage.

DEC: This deal poses more than an integration challenge; Compaq is going to use
DEC to remake its own business model. Compaq now has 25,000 technicians plus
10,000 direct marketing/sales personnel who are supposed to help it build
relationships with customers, thus pumping up service revenues and helping the
firm win jobs it otherwise might have lost. However, Compaq will now be competing
against many of its current partners, from information technology consultants to its
channel resellers. That usually spells trouble.

Distractions: Compaq just launched a $300 million branding campaign with a
beautiful but idiotic 12-page spread in the Wall Street Journal. These ads (like those
run by Seagate and Oracle) are a waste of money because they don't focus on
actually selling products. Besides, those pull-out ad sections just get tossed
anyway. Pfeiffer also thinks Compaq should blow money investing in cable and on
various Web start-ups to help accelerate demand for faster, higher margin PCs. But
Compaq simply doesn't have the margins of Microsoft or Intel, so it just can't afford
such extraneous ventures. Add this kind of stuff to the task of taming DEC, and
Compaq seems a long way from what should be its major concern -- improving
manufacturing efficiency.

The question is, what business model will thrive in today's computer marketplace?
Compaq is moving from being primarily a manufacturer to being all things to all
customers. This strategy should lead to continued revenue growth, but its effect on
margins is unclear. Meanwhile, Dell is focusing on one goal: being the most
profitable computer manufacturer on the planet, partly by managing its assets
exceptionally well and partly by migrating its business into the server market rather
than down into the under $1,000 box market. Dell is happy to rely on partners for all
the other stuff.

While there's nothing wrong with developing new competencies, it's tougher than
focusing on improving your core competencies. I see Compaq fooling around on the
former while Dell keeps working hard at what it does best, which includes preparing
to kick Compaq's butt while Pfeiffer et al. have their backs turned.



To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (51526)7/15/1998 6:10:00 PM
From: Dell-icious  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 176387
 
From The Motley Fool: must read for DELL and CPQ investors
Compaq Bull's Pen
by Chris Rugaber (tmfrfk@aol.com)

If I were just a company shill for Compaq, I could talk
about its four years of global PC market domination,
despite that market's cutthroat price competition. Or, I
could note that its server computers are so widely used
that, according to its 1997 annual report, "nearly 50
percent of e-mail transmissions, 60 percent of all credit
card transactions, 80 percent of all Automated Teller
Machine [ATM] transactions and 90 percent of all
securities transactions. run through Compaq servers."
Even allowing for some annual report hyperbole, that's
pretty impressive. (Full disclosure: We use some
Compaq servers here at the Motley Fool.)

While impressive, such corporate PR is really only half
the story. Compaq, thanks to its recent acquisitions of
Digital Equipment Corp. and Tandem Computers, is now
the second largest computer company in the world. PCs
will be a smaller part of its business going forward, and
considering the challenges that the personal computing
industry will face in the coming years, that's a good
thing.

So, if you need PCs, servers, notebooks, networking
equipment, web-hosting capability, modems, printers,
hand-held personal digital assistants, 64-bit high-end workstations, and the support
services and consulting needed to hold it all together, Compaq can provide it -- and
more. The company's acquisition of Digital included Internet search engine Alta
Vista, which presumably explains the nice big link to Compaq's website in the
bottom right of Alta Vista's home page. Most companies would have to pay a pretty
penny for that.

Compaq aims to have $15 billion in services revenue and $60 billion in total revenue
by 2002, more than double 1997 sales. If the company returns to pre-1998 margins,
profits should also grow accordingly. Zacks' consensus estimates are for EPS of
$0.58 in 1998 and $1.63 in 1999. At recent share prices ($28 15/16 on June 26th), that's
only 17.75 times '99 earnings.

Of course, the big knock against Compaq is its recent inventory problems, which
reduced net income from a high of $667 million in the fourth quarter of '97 to an
anemic, one-cent EPS, or $16 million, in the first quarter of '98. Clearly, the company
miscalculated demand in the middle of an ongoing PC price war, and it suffered
accordingly. But Compaq has moved aggressively to solve the problem. It has
reduced inventories from over $2 billion in the third quarter of '97 to $1.26 billion in
the first quarter of this year.

In addition, Compaq is developing its "Optimized Distribution Model," which will
include direct sales over the Web and "build to order" kiosks that will be placed in
most major computer stores. The kiosks are presumably an attempt to placate
resellers, who will object to being undercut by direct web sales if Compaq goes too
far down that road. It's a tricky problem, and it's unclear at this point how it will work
out. Can Compaq move to a "just in time" direct sales model without alienating its
resellers? Should it try to? Is there a happy medium? After all, it's perfectly easy to
buy Compaqs both over the Web and at CompUSA now.

The happy medium may already have been found, however: Compaq CEO Eckhard
Pfeiffer recently noted that when reseller websites are included, Compaq sells more
over the Internet than Dell -- $6 million a day versus Dell's $5 million. Yes, yes, Dell
turns its inventory over much more quickly than Compaq, but so what? Compaq is
moving beyond simply trying to be the fastest PC distributor in the world.

Others question whether Compaq can swallow its $9.6 billion purchase of Digital
Equipment Corp., the largest merger in the computer world's history. Clearly, DEC
adds a lot to Compaq: 25,000 service technicians, including 2,000 certified Windows
NT engineers; access to thousands of business customers, which will put Compaq
ahead of IBM as the top PC supplier to large businesses; and the rights to Alpha,
Digital's 64-bit high-end microprocessor that's two years ahead of Intel's Merced
[Ed. Note: Intel recently bought the rights to Alpha technology.] This will be the
acid test for Compaq over the next couple of quarters, but as one analyst noted,
"Management is not underestimating the task." By looking at margins and revenue
streams, it should be possible for investors to track the company's success (or
failure) in this endeavor.

More importantly, these unresolved issues of sales models and acquisition
digestion are at least partly priced into the stock, which declined significantly when
Compaq's channel inventory problems became apparent. In fact, one could argue
that Compaq is a classic example of Wall Street overreaction to what will likely be a
temporary condition. In the long run, inventory management is simply not the
biggest issue that PC companies will face.

Instead, there are bigger challenges to be faced. Will other "Internet appliances,"
such as Web-TV devices, cut into PC sales? Probably -- so it's a good thing Compaq
is likely to beat Dell and other PC makers in bringing a PC-TV hybrid to market. Are
price wars going to continue? Undoubtedly, but that's why Compaq's broadening of
its business is a good thing. Dell, meanwhile, will also face challenges. Until
recently, its main supplier of customer services was. Digital Equipment
Corporation. Whoops!

Compaq is likely to significantly grow revenue and profits, it has a couple of clear,
easily monitored risks, and all at a fairly decent price. What more does anyone need
in a high-priced market like this?



To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (51526)7/15/1998 6:37:00 PM
From: On the QT  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
Love the line "Whenever a stock starts to move up they disappear like the Invisible Man taking off his bandages".

Thanks for pointing out Geoff Nunns post I agree with your assessment of Geoffs post: "excellent". Ditto!

Do I detect a new direction on your part? Is it possible that you are starting to move into their (TA )arena? If so you may indeed be in good company.

In any event, anyone that owns a dozen or so stocks and finds that Dell's move today was in the middle of the pack has to be a very good and happy person.

A Dell of the day. Yes and the Chuzzlewit moves to the head of the "pack". In fact you shall be the first to get a borrowed and somewhat altered salute but nevertheless a very respectful:

May the Dell be with you!



To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (51526)7/15/1998 6:44:00 PM
From: jimleon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
Chuzz, what else is doing good for you? Dell is my largest
holding followed by LU. Been buying aol lately.
I am an AOL bull believe it or not.
I see it as an asset play . AOL will be like CBS, ABC, FOX
in a couple of years. DCLK is my speculative one.



To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (51526)7/15/1998 7:12:00 PM
From: Mohan Marette  Respond to of 176387
 
Please refer to Voodoo or Elliot Wave.

Paul:

I just checked the dictionary to find out the meaning of TA and it read 'please refer to Voodoo or Elliot Wave Theroy'.<VBG>