SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Emile Vidrine who wrote (23671)7/15/1998 8:31:00 PM
From: George S. Montgomery  Respond to of 108807
 
Emile, I blush as I begin to respond to a post of yours. You have me somewhat baffled. I do not know whether you are an ingenious joker or a maniac.

More that a year ago, on this thread, or Poets, or such, I held that it was impossible to discuss "God" without agreeing upon a definition of what it was that we were discussing.

You assume that "God" is the chappy who created all this shit. Now, what if that differed from someone else's definition, that creation wasn't a necessary feat of the almighty?

Will you email me, please, about my great perplexity: Are you putting us all on, or are you a bona fide fanatic? gsm



To: Emile Vidrine who wrote (23671)7/15/1998 8:46:00 PM
From: Ish  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
Wrong Emile, not that you aren't right. What I'm getting at is that there is one Supreme Being, call Him what you may, or Her, but the supreme being is all to all no matter what the Name. God is God and the rules change according to the game.