To: Yousef who wrote (34660 ) 7/17/1998 11:29:00 AM From: Majic- Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572384
As an end-user I would rather buy a cheap 300 MHz cpu witch is upgradable, (and faster than other 300 MHz cpu's) than an expansive 300 witch has "big brothers"..... I don't think it really matters or not wether Intel has got more MHz. It's not quantity we are talking about, it's quality witch (Should) matter. Alpha Dec has been around a GIGAhertz (1000 MHz) for a while, but Intel would 'nt care less, because they can't compete anyhow in the high-end server market. I don't think that the aim of AMD is killing high-end pII's (wich are not sold as much as 300 MHz pII or 333's..), but to eliminate the Johny-average-city-guy who has interest in a good,fast and affordable mid-class cpu, from buying Intel. I found that at least in Europe, the most sold PII are the 300 and 333's. Especially the 300's. And AMD also has those cpu's available right now, for quite a bit cheaper. So I don't worry about Amd NOT catching up. I find the FUTURE of AMD quite bright, and at least for a couple of months I don't see any reason why customers won't choose AMD above Intel. Oh yeah that remind's me : Intel is loosing market share , even with their ZILLION dollar marketing strategies ...I have seen an Advertizement of AMD ONE time in my life (In a mag..)... Whilst Intel is perforating the whole consumer market with their single minded view about their own cpu's. Amd isn't that dependend on what ADVERTIZEMENT says, no, they rather develop slick and cost-effective solutions, wich will win the Intel-AMD race on the long haul. Consumers have got brains too , you know.... "oS Ti ekAMD", Michael da Kota. (turn it around ;)