Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (34747)	7/18/1998 12:32:00 PM
From: Majic-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573116

YEss I do. I am from Holland, and am in constant time need, and YESS I see all those nice red spelling mistakes, but when I am in a hurry I don't feel like correcting them, or looking up the right spelling. And you do understand what I am trying to tell you, so minor spelling mistakes don't really matter . But I'll try to keep my eyes open oke ? And I already posted the benchmark images with the comparison between 100 and 66 MHz busclock. With Pov-ray, to be exact. -Keep YOUR eyes open.;) cyu, Michael da Kota from Holland with Love And oh pleaze when I state "AMD K-6 will not be used much in NT, NORE does the Celeron" , just be man enough to not only cut the first half, but the whole sentence. Cutting only half of some one elses word's is such a cliche way of being "right", and for me just means you could not or did not dear to discuss the low performance of the Celeron under NT . ( wich is just a pII without cache, and when the K6-2 would be fitted out with 2ndary cache onboard (wich Amd is planning) the result would be a MAJOR performance increase under NT, just as big as the difference between pII and Celeron under NT is)