Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Georgia Bard's Corner -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dusty who wrote (3802)	7/19/1998 11:23:00 AM
From: Ga Bard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9440

Yep you are right and I got 4 case numbers on an individual after the fact but I have not found a website to acquire those case numbers. Also a civil case does not prove wrong doing only a degorging of profits if the named individual made a profit or a recoup of losses by the plaintiffs. Some of the cases of the four are default judgements which means the defendant did not show up in court. Winning a civil and collecting is two different things. Criminal is one thing and civil is another. Also if the civil is part of a large caseor sting to start with they do not let the cases get severed because it weakens their over all case. Opinions vary on this idea but that is why we have to courts. Also a case relocated would also cost additional money for a whole new set of attorneys, filings, court scheduling, etc etc etc to try which is not wise move on the prosecution because now they have to go the local district court to try it and probably cannot use the larger case as evifence. Typically if a case is relocated there is insufficinet evidence if any at all to try the case which is why the case was severed. JMHO GB