SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (10827)7/19/1998 2:49:00 PM
From: Robohogs  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Don't get me wrong - as I have posted in the past (thank the heavens I couldn't get stock to short at $40), I too think this is a losing stock eventually (once it turns profitable in 2000/2001 and people start seeing a PE or when we get the crash of ???? that everyone seems to be predicting). The problem is there has to be a catalyst.

With respect to inventory, I would assume AMZN could likely get by by ordering 1000 copies each of the 1000 biggest sellers (i.e., 1 mm books at $12 per book or only $12 million). So they could probably get to a point where they are big enough to stock inventory and do only larger orders.

Does anyone know how Barnes and Noble or Borders restock individual stores? Do they have a warehouse somewhere, do they go to distributors or do they go to the publishers? Amazon will have an advantage here since they will only need to stock one or two centers and not hundreds of books and they can only stock the biggest sellers (remember the old 80/20 rule - 80% of sales from 20% of products) and pay more for the lower sellers (which are probably lower cost from publishers and hence distributors anyway given less demand).

Don't get me wrong - AMZN is over-valued but for the simple reason that there are resources on the net to find the absolute lowest cost and I would always go to the cheapest for a commodity product. AMZN has to stay an entertainment and IT (full of content such as best-sellers and reviews and unique search tools) to win the game. Will they ever make money? yes Are they worth almost $10 billion? Absolutely not.



To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (10827)7/19/1998 3:03:00 PM
From: Robohogs  Respond to of 164684
 
Regarding shorting

I have still been unable to find shares to short at any of my brokers (Smith Barney or Quick & Reilly or Alex. Brown). Are shorts still hard to get?

I have never shorted and wondered what the broker does with the cash received in the short sale - does he get the interest or do you and if you don't, do you get charged a borrowing cost other than the dividends?

Finally, has anyone tried a synthetic short by buying puts and raising the capital for the puts by selling same month, same strike naked calls. At last week's $120 strike quotes, it would have cost around $1-3 to do this depending on the month of expiration.



To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (10827)7/19/1998 8:44:00 PM
From: Bolder  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Glenn----How did B&T receive as much as 5 million shares of AMZN stock in the first place? Is Igrahms also a stockholder? Perhaps, AMZN gave B&T stock in lieu of having to pay 8-10 % more for its product.