To: marcos who wrote (5526 ) 7/20/1998 9:08:00 AM From: eric deaver Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 11684
Marcos, <<Nobody suggested that the company posted it, and I'm sure that neither you nor bbruin nor DGCruise posted it, but some wacko mtei shareholder and/or hypester posted it - with the clear intention of halting any meaningful analysis of the stock in public. And he/she/they absolutely must be seen to fail in that purpose, imho.>> Two points here, you are not suggesting that the company posted it but you are suggesting that the company is involved with this fellow in some way. Very clearly and with absolutely no evidence. THIS, IMO, defines LIBEL. But we can agree that this wacko (shareholder or not - we truly do not know) does have "the intention of halting any meaningful analysis of the company. And he/she/they absolutely must be seen to fail in that purpose" which is why the plethora of posts regarding these "death threats" must stop and YES they should be ignored ON THIS THREAD. Not ignored period just not posted and re-posted on this thread. <<"Come on and get real..." - this is as real as it gets, eric. Are we able as a species to use this incredible technology to speak openly and frankly without resorting to violence or the threat of violence?">> Moving away from the Carl Sagan viewpoint for a minute, with all this incredible technology, why doesn't Janice and crew simply identify the cretin and have him/her arrested? It would serve both our purposes as stated above. Marcos, please refrain in the future from trying to tie MTEI to these boneheads as there is obviously no connection - you are doing yourself a great disservice - and this is what I meant by GET REAL. Fellow longs, sorry to discuss this so much on this thread - I will not discuss anymore and will take any followup remarks w/ marcos to PM. Eric