SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dale J. who wrote (34961)7/22/1998 1:55:00 AM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572945
 
Dale, <I question the advantages of copper at this point.>
It is your rights indeed. But these words about traffic
at 0.18 and 0.13 are pure speculation on Mr. Brookwood
part. I do not mean to question his prior experience
in the field, but I am 120% sure he has NO idea
as what is going on in current labs. It is just too
important for the companies involved. We have
here a perfect example of "expert limits" -
Yousef. I am much sure Mr. Brookwood never saw
a SPICE model for silicon gates and interconnects,
but anyway takes a liberty to talk about feature
sizes and traffic congestion.

About a year ago I was beaten on Intel thread
for not including interconnection delays
into speed path estimations, and all it was about
0.35um technology. I guess you understand that
these problems do not go away with further chip
shrinks, but quite opposite. IMO, all future
transitions will be "incremental". You will
not see 2X speed gain with each hypothetical
(0.25/0.18)^^2 shrink. Same goes for copper.
At least there is some innovation here.
And I do not think the companies will waste
billions in R&D just to hype investors. (Only
Intel can do this, to keep value for their labor
compensation plan).

<Intel will wait until the benefits are real.>
Ok, I can live with that :-)

P.S. The rebuttal is lengthy and unconvincing:
who wants to pick nits about what was launched
before whom or whatever.



To: Dale J. who wrote (34961)7/25/1998 6:27:00 PM
From: Steve Porter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572945
 
Dale,

Elmer (or Yousef) and myself had a discussion about copper technology and it's usefulness a while back on the Cyrix/NSM thread. The shocking part is we both agreed. Jump on over there and take a look at it (it was a while ago, and maybe one of those two can tell you how far back it way).. I don't really remember the date, but hey, it's only a date ;-)

Steve