Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greenpeace who wrote (17233)	7/22/1998 1:49:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

GP: Please elaborate. I'd genuinely like to hear how unbiased thinking and analysis will make a sane person reach the conclusion that Clinton is other than as he appears. (Without values or morals) JLA

To: Greenpeace who wrote (17233)	7/22/1998 1:52:00 PM
From: Catfish	Respond to of 20981

GreenPIECE, I would like to see your response to jlallen's question. Again, your ignorance (or is it stupidity) is astounding. Btw, are you old enough to vote.....just curious???

To: Greenpeace who wrote (17233)	7/22/1998 2:07:00 PM
From: lazarre	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

Greenpiece: Your optimism astonishes even me! These guys are in orbit--and I'm not even talking Earth. I think more like the 3rd moon of Jupiter.

To: Greenpeace who wrote (17233)	7/22/1998 2:11:00 PM
From: Rick Slemmer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

If you think and analyze this presidency as much as I have, you will see that in the context of 20th century leaders, Clinton is at or near the top. This ought to be good. OK, Bill Clinton vs. William McKinley Teddy Roosevelt William Taft Woodrow Wilson Warren Harding Calvin Coolidge Herbert Hoover Franklin Roosevelt Harry Truman Dwight Eisenhower John Kennedy Lyndon Johnson Richard Nixon Gerald Ford Jimmy Carter Ronald Reagan George Bush Now that the history lesson is over, please tell us which presidents you believe (after, of course, the appropriate stopping and thinking), rank BELOW Mr Clinton in terms of historical importance. Oh, yes, you'll also want to tell us precisely why Mr Clinton is superior to those you list beneath him. RS

To: Greenpeace who wrote (17233)	7/22/1998 2:21:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Respond to of 20981

>>It just requires some deep analysis Not unlike yourself, Green Pees. Instead of all this talk of your analysis, let's hear your analyst speak for himself. Clinton is already ranked in the bottom quintile of 20th century Presidents. And with Harding moving up (he wasn't personally and politically corrupt like Clinton) it looks like Clinton has an absolute lock on the cellar.