SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Greenpeace who wrote (17248)7/22/1998 3:24:00 PM
From: DMaA  Respond to of 20981
 
I won't blame him for the highest bankruptcy rates since the great depression if you don't give him credit for the lowest inflation rates in 40 years.



To: Greenpeace who wrote (17248)7/22/1998 3:39:00 PM
From: Zoltan!  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20981
 
>>OK, I'll share the essense of the analysis. (And I'll write really slow so Zoltan can keep up with us.) Clinton's achievements are unparralelled.

You better start writing slower because you're clearly outpacing what passed for your brain.

Green Pees:

At last we now know why you are so confused. We asked you to try thinking and to try to do some analysis.

But you refuse to think and keep giving us urinalysis!. Hateful and invincibly ignorant is no way for you to go through life, Green Pees!

Please do try to keep it in the bowl. And don't worry, we'll continue to flush for you.

btw, only three 20th century Presidents are rated "great": Teddy Roosevelt, FDR and Ronald Reagan. Johnson isn't in the top half, Kennedy was a lightweight and is falling fast while corrupt Clinton has the bottom locked. Even Barney Frank, who passes for an intellectual in the Dem party, recently stated that Clinton was "politically irrelevant". Clinton's only legacy is as a national disgrace who has presided during the continuing prosperity unleashed by Ronald Reagan. Read this (if you can read) and weep, Green Pees:
pathfinder.com@@lO74aAQAWXnZ0US9/time/time100/leaders/profile/reagan.html

Clinton will never make that list, because like you, he is a bad joke. Or merely the punchline to one.



To: Greenpeace who wrote (17248)7/22/1998 4:04:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Respond to of 20981
 
>>And I'll write really slow so Zoltan can keep up with us.<<

Just so you'll know, you can write just as fast as you please..... we don't see your "writings" until you submit your response, and oh, those big red letters you see? That's the spell-check function....
As to the "content" of your post?????? Oh, never mind, "content"? yeah, right......Duncan, we've know for quite some time that Clinton has always appealed to the lowest common denominator, but this is getting ridiculous.....

Peace, baby
bp



To: Greenpeace who wrote (17248)7/22/1998 4:14:00 PM
From: Rick Slemmer  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 20981
 
Clinton's achievements are unparralelled.

So's your spelling. Pubic school, was it?

Economy: best in century.

Somehow, despite confiscatory tax rates and more federal business regulations than ever. I'm self-employed. I know.

Environment: total reversal of Reagan policies, resulting in clean air, harbor cleanups, preservation of wildlife and parks.

What Reagan policies? Been to Los Angeles or Denver recently? No clean air there.

Foriegn affairs: peace.

The folks in Bosnia, Israel, and Somalia will be happy to hear this. Not to mention the newest victims in Northern Ireland.

Crime: lowest levels in half a century.

You've got to be kidding. Then why is every Democrat promising even more cops on the street for the upcoming election?

Education: renewed emphasis and teacher/student testing.

And the lowest test scores in American history. Seen where Arkansas was rated 50th out of 50 for test scores while he was governor? And why does he send Chelsea to a private school and forbid low- and middle-class Americans to do the same with school vouchers? (Hint: NEA)

Energy: lowest cost, abundant supply.

He made more oil? Or maybe he supplied the funds to build more nuclear power plants. How environmentally incorrect.

Race: poor, but funally being addressed.

There is no race problem. It is Mr Clinton and his Democrat friends who insist there is.

Labor: highest wages in history.

Accompanied by the highest retroactive tax rates in history.

Social Security: he's fixing this now.

I'm betting against it. As long as he keeps raiding the fund for general spending, I'd be smarter to trust my own trading skills rather than Mr Clinton's bureaucratic dictums.

He rates at the top end of presidents, trailing only FDR and LBJ.

I can't comment on FDR. Before my time.

Mr Johnson, on the other hand, sent me to Vietnam, where I lost two friends, considerable blood, and more than a little naivete about what politicians say and what they do. How many billions of dollars have we poured into his "Great Society" and his "War on Poverty," only to see the costs continue to escalate while the Democrats themselves tell us the problem is getting worse?

Sorry. Your Mr Clinton will be a footnote to history, along with Millard Fillmore, Jimmy Carter, and Gerald Ford. And he will be as reviled as Richard Nixon. He is, and always will be, a laughingstock without any meaningful legacy outside of his pathetic attempts to take credit for events beyond his control.

RS



To: Greenpeace who wrote (17248)7/22/1998 7:39:00 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20981
 
The essence of the "analysis". You should have started that post with: "Once upon a time............." If you really believe that stuff I'd have to say you were Bateman's alter ego. Your post has been more than adequately responded to so I won't respond to the whole fairy tale you have written. However, the part of your post that rankles most with me is the "racial politics". The race hucksters like Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, etc., etc. have a vested interest in continuing to agitate over "racial" issues, preserving affirmative action quotas, etc. Its how they make a living. They classify and divide us. If there is a "racial" problem it is a problem of failed or frustrated expectations caused by the unfair, divisive and foolish policies these hucksters advocate. To disagree is to be a racist or Uncle Tom. No real dialogue is ever allowed.

Take a look at this: creators.com

JLA